<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.appian.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>TINYINT replaced by BIT in xsd?</title><link>https://community.appian.com/discussions/f/data/23461/tinyint-replaced-by-bit-in-xsd</link><description>I couldn&amp;#39;t get my DataStore to to republish a DataType association that&amp;#39;s been around for a year. 
 Finally, I created a new DataType from the same view and compared the downloaded xsd&amp;#39;s 
 Old one: 
 &amp;lt;xsd:appinfo source=&amp;quot;appian.jpa&amp;quot;&amp;gt;@Column(name=&amp;quot;isMultiplePlan</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: TINYINT replaced by BIT in xsd?</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/89884?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 06:21:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:786538c6-cc5c-43bf-8a01-dd4eb1295e2e</guid><dc:creator>Harshit Bumb (Appyzie)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Colin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That might be the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;But&amp;nbsp;BIT is always a better option than&amp;nbsp;TINYINT as the BIT&amp;nbsp;will only store 1 or 0. I have personally only used&amp;nbsp;BIT for any boolean flag on the DB side and then map it to boolean on the Appian side.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Harshit&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>