https://community.appian.com/discussions/f/data/2808/we-have-defined-a-process-proc01-in-which-3-users-are-involved-these-3-users-uWe have defined a process proc01 in which 3 users are involved. These 3 users (user1, user2 and user3) are saved as process variables. Now we have defined a process backed record of this process proc01. In order to implement security for the process ween-USTelligent Community 12https://community.appian.com/thread/9849?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 06 Jun 2014 17:01:02 GMTd3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:0d817c81-2e03-4747-a9b1-5aa988fa2eb0JEAN PIERREDue to the fact, that social tasks have no deadline, this simple task management application became a priority for our internal client.<div style="clear:both;"></div>https://community.appian.com/thread/9848?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 06 Jun 2014 16:59:59 GMTd3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:6c57141e-b27a-4bfc-a0b6-c8d43392c45bJEAN PIERREI dont think so. Let me explain.<br />The application is a simple task management application.<br />user1=Task Asigner<br />user2=Task Asignee<br />user3=supervisor of the Task Asignee<br />Every instance of the process has different roles asigned, the roles are determined at runtime.<br />The idea is that the three users can only see the taks where they are involved. It would be uncomfortable for a manager named Michael that, for example, a machine operator named John can see the task that the CEO David asigned to him.<div style="clear:both;"></div>https://community.appian.com/thread/9840?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:48:27 GMTd3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:9751f8bc-ebcb-4c5e-bc72-6e6cde11023bmoritzwWouldn&#39;t setting the process security to those three users be sufficient for your requirement?!<div style="clear:both;"></div>