<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.appian.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Package Deployment -  If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/discussions/f/general/6457/package-deployment---if-we-are-having-fn-appy-rule-yourrulename-a</link><description>Package Deployment - If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { array }) inside a script node output, then Appian Designer feature Missing Precedents doesn’t find the rule yourRuleName as precedents. Is there any particular reason for this ? OriginalPostID</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25315?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:52:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:4d93c4f2-66d5-48cd-b417-27d91bd5f4f4</guid><dc:creator>SANTOSH S KUNDLIK</dc:creator><description>yes, got it now. @joshi your syntax works :)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25303?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:25:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:e4c60174-581d-4c3c-812f-fa729af4805e</guid><dc:creator>Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies</dc:creator><description>Perhaps it hasn&amp;#39;t been fixed. Regardless, Josh is correct, the rule will show up in Missing Precedents if you use his syntax.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25279?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 03:19:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:3ff528da-2fe9-46ce-8ba7-5b53b8b8c20f</guid><dc:creator>SANTOSH S KUNDLIK</dc:creator><description>We are using 7.10 &amp;amp; i have tried apply(rule!test, {&amp;quot;a&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;b&amp;quot;}), and it doesn&amp;#39;t find rule!test as precedent for that application having only PM.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25278?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:49:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:7055d34b-4a2d-40f5-b8a1-19bd8ac94cc0</guid><dc:creator>sikhivahans</dc:creator><description>Has it got some thing to do with syntax error? I remember reading in the documentation somewhere that the syntax errors results in inability to trace relationships. @joshl seems to be right as per my knowledge.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25274?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:d36196e4-4bb5-4f6e-ba70-edecea628172</guid><dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator><description>If you use the syntax fn!apply(rule!yourRuleName(_), {array}) then yourRuleName will be picked up as a precedent.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Package Deployment -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/25272?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 01:09:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:a523e783-7035-40eb-8acb-b6a7d18f4c4a</guid><dc:creator>Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies</dc:creator><description>This is a known issue. I believe it has been fixed in more recent releases. What version are you on?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>