Question in appian associate developer exam ACD101

RE: Question in appian associate developer exam ACD101

mohameds5069 — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:34:36 GMT

thank you

RE: Question in appian associate developer exam ACD101

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:28:18 GMT

[quote userid="289202" url="~/discussions/f/new-to-appian/37612/question-in-appian-associate-developer-exam-acd101/141165"]what if I want to keep that field in the database, but I don't need it in my Appian app through the record type, isn't A is the solution[/quote]

Well that's why i was implying A was probably the correct answer, since I gave reasons B and C both probably *aren't* the answer.

RE: Question in appian associate developer exam ACD101

mohameds5069 — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:34:05 GMT

what if I want to keep that field in the database, but I don't need it in my Appian app through the record type, isn't A is the solution for this situation , and based on my understanding to record type sync , the sync won't affect the changes of the fields that was made on the record type into the data source which is the database

RE: Question in appian associate developer exam ACD101

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:10:11 GMT

B is inapplicable since Record Type data doesn't use CDTs. C, I believe (though i haven't tried), would probably not do anything as far as modifying the RecordType, other than causing errors. Synced Records are set up such that designers should be able to do most (if not all) necessary maintenance from the Appian front-end.