<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.appian.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Small bug in Appian Sub Process Node</title><link>https://community.appian.com/discussions/f/process/12948/small-bug-in-appian-sub-process-node</link><description>Hello Appian, 
 
 Good Day. 
 
 I felt that there is a small bug in Appian “Sub Process” Node. We are not able to figure out the process model parameter whether they are required or multiple . 
 
 Example Scenario: 
 There is a process model &amp;quot;ABC_createRequest</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Small bug in Appian Sub Process Node</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/58314?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:37:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:ee07e944-467b-4da6-8a8c-257605e1cdf4</guid><dc:creator>Robert Shankin</dc:creator><description>I&amp;#39;d classify this as a useful enhancement request rather than a bug.&lt;br /&gt;
If enhance accordingly, this may somewhat improve designers ability to deliver faster. &lt;br /&gt;
Consider opening a ticket with Appian Support in order to share your findings, and to make your case as to why this would be a valuable product enhancement.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As &lt;a href="/members/shwetad"&gt;shwetad&lt;/a&gt; noted, you can always have the child process open in another tab to reference the nature of the child process&amp;#39;s parameters.&lt;br /&gt;
Further, consider using more informative variable names to give you an indication as to whether or not a parameter accepts multiples.  For example, instead of &amp;quot;accountNumber&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;locationCode&amp;quot; use &amp;quot;accountNumbers&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;locationCodes&amp;quot; (plural) when the field supports multiples.  &lt;br /&gt;
Then you&amp;#39;ll have a clue in the parent process whether or not the fields support multiples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This doesn&amp;#39;t help much with requiredness.  &lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#39;m not saying you should, but you could always extend the variable naming convention to use a &amp;quot;_reqd&amp;quot; suffix, or similar, if it&amp;#39;s that important to you.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Small bug in Appian Sub Process Node</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/58235?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:29:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:84d7647d-ee3e-48fa-a969-cd9e1625d421</guid><dc:creator>chetany</dc:creator><description>Please click on the &amp;quot;Refresh&amp;quot; option that you see on the subprocess node.&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes, the child process model may have been published and some parameters changed.&lt;br /&gt;
The parent process model may not have got refreshed automatically.&lt;br /&gt;
I think if you refresh on the subprocess node, it will show the updated parameters. (and also show if they are multiple)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Small bug in Appian Sub Process Node</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/58221?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 06:14:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:cc9eff1f-5969-4353-8722-5daa405448aa</guid><dc:creator>shwetad7106</dc:creator><description>Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, you are right. We can&amp;#39;t check it is multiple or not, we have to go to that sub process and then check, and accordingly pass the values.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Small bug in Appian Sub Process Node</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/58200?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:57:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:0014797c-223f-4418-a6f2-cd5d2927fbaf</guid><dc:creator>chandu</dc:creator><description>Hi Anil,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good one, I feel that Appian can look into this, since giving required indicator to the Input variables in the subprocess node lets the designer to configure Mandatorily.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>