Subprocess smart service 'Assignment' configuration and lane assignment in subprocess

RE: Subprocess smart service 'Assignment' configuration and lane assignment in subprocess

Shubham Aware — Tue, 28 May 2024 12:06:56 GMT

[quote userid="269236" url="~/discussions/f/process/35093/subprocess-smart-service-assignment-configuration-and-lane-assignment-in-subprocess"]

But I am confused with case 1 & 3.

[/quote]
Subprocess security follows the lane assignment in the subprocess itself.
Process B designer's security applies if the lane assignment is set to 'Run as whoever designed this process model'.

"Run as Designer" in Process B = Process B designer's security (Case 1 & 3).
Process B allows inheritance (no "Run as Designer") = Inherits security from Process A (Case 2 & 4).
Process A: "Run as Starter" = Starter's security (Case 2).

RE: Subprocess smart service 'Assignment' configuration and lane assignment in subprocess

supriyab0004 — Tue, 28 May 2024 11:34:22 GMT

1. In your first case process B will be started under the security context of the user who initiated Process A, but tasks within process B will execute under the security context of the designer(i.e., user who last published the process model) of Process B.

2. In second case the initiation and task execution for Process B will run under the security context of the user who started Process A.

3. In the 3rd case initiation and task execution in Process B will run under the security context of the designer of their respective process models. If Process A and Process B have the same designer, then it’s the designer’s context. If different, each under their respective designers' context.

4. For the 4th case process B will be started under the security context of the designer of Process A. Tasks within Process B will also execute under the security context of the designer of Process A, as the initiator of Process B is the designer of Process A.

RE: Subprocess smart service 'Assignment' configuration and lane assignment in subprocess

sarathkumar13 — Tue, 28 May 2024 08:46:38 GMT

If its run as whoever started the process model, it will take the security of the person who initiated the process. If its run as whoever designed the process model, it will take the security of the person who lastly saved and published the process model.

I hope that clarifies. Just think in the same lines all over the place wherever you mentioned the same

If the node is configured as run as whoever started or whoever designed, it will take the same context and will run in the same way as configured