Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

Stefan Helzle — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:05:36 GMT

With so many dependencies on private data, it is impossible for me to say anything.

When I had similar issues in the past, I sooner or later had a facepalm moment once I understood that I was the problem.

BTW, why do you do both queries, just to throw away the result of one of it.

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

francescai9347 — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:31:21 GMT

Yes, in the following part of the expression rule we use a rule input but values are used only after the evaluation of this query.

In detail, we run 2 different query, stored in 2 different local variable and we use the rule input to evaluate a third local variable with one of the 2 preceeding.

E.g

local1: a!queryRecordType(...),

local2: a!queryRecordType(...),

local3: if(ri!input="1", local1, local2)

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

Soma — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:24:06 GMT

Are you passing any values to this rule while invoking it in the script task. If yes can share that details

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

francescai9347 — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:33:12 GMT

RIGHT ANSWER:

Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 12/04/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 16/04/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 440(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 13/06/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 16/07/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 17/07/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 335(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 18/07/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 4103.47(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 23/07/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 675(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 06/08/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 910(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 07/08/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 195(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 09/09/2024(Data)

EXAMPLE OF A WRONG ANSWER:

Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 12/04/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 16/04/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 440(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 08/02/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 22/02/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 0(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 17/03/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 335(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 15/03/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 4103.47(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 23/07/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 675(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 06/08/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 910(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 09/04/2024(Data)
Mappa
- IMPORTO 195(Numero (decimale))
- DATA 09/09/2024(Data)

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

francescai9347 — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 07:16:51 GMT

Hi, this is the first part of the expression rule we call from the process, stored in a local variable because is a partial elaboration of the ER.

Saving its result we can see sometime is not correct in DATA field of the map (we have the right number of element in the map, with correct measure but wrong group).

  a!queryRecordType(
    recordType:  'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD',
    fields: a!aggregationFields(
      groupings: {
        a!grouping(
          field: 'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD.fields.{4aa8d14a-37a8-49b3-83cd-a53638bc83e8}DATA_PAGAMENTO',
          alias: "DATA",
          interval: "DATE"
        )
      },
      measures: {
        a!measure(
          function: "SUM",
          field: 'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD.fields.{ce39a834-36e1-4d1e-a837-166a14889542}IMPORTO_PAGATO',
          alias: "IMPORTO"
        )
      }
    ),
    filters: a!queryLogicalExpression(
      operator: "AND",
      filters: {
        a!queryFilter(
          field: 'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD.fields.{d8a3e8d0-eebc-4c54-8fbd-8fda411c4502}TIPO_COMMISSIONE',
          operator: "in",
          value: {cons!FET_tipoCommissioneCreditoReteEsternaAssociazioni, cons!FET_tipoCommissioneCreditoReteEsternaAgenti}
        ),
        a!queryFilter(
          field:  'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD.fields.{f0d2064b-9f01-44ba-81a0-97ffa82a0ddf}STATO_COMMISSIONE',
          operator: "in",
          value: {"PAGATE"}
        ),
        a!queryFilter(
          field: 'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758c}RECORD.fields.{0cd4413f-de42-4a9e-935c-176e414421bd}DATA_CREAZIONE',
          operator: ">",
          value: cons!FET_DataCut
        ),
        a!queryFilter(
          field: 'recordType!{8d214138-b859-4710-9cea-02edebba758d}RECORD.fields.{4aa8d14a-37a8-49b3-83cd-a53638bc83e8}DATA_PAGAMENTO',
          operator: "not null"
        )
      },
      ignoreFiltersWithEmptyValues: true
    ),
    pagingInfo: a!pagingInfo(
      startIndex: 1,
      batchSize: 500
    ),
  ).data ,

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

Soma — Sun, 29 Sep 2024 03:19:15 GMT

More details on the expression rule please

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

David Jimenez — Sat, 28 Sep 2024 10:26:43 GMT

Probably the parameters differs on each execution in the PM.....

RE: Random wrong results from expression rule in process model

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 19:31:32 GMT

Such random issues are extremely difficult to find. Especially when we have no details. Can you share some?