<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.appian.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The article about change and configuration management is very good. However, I d</title><link>https://community.appian.com/discussions/f/process/404/the-article-about-change-and-configuration-management-is-very-good-however-i-d</link><description>The article about change and configuration management is very good. However, I don&amp;#39;t understand one point that is being made at the &amp;quot;Database Change Management Best Practices&amp;quot;( forum.appian.com/.../Change_and_Configuration_Management The fourth point</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: The article about change and configuration management is very good. However, I d</title><link>https://community.appian.com/thread/1183?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:11:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">d3a83456-d57b-489c-a84c-4e8267bb592a:0e225f57-947c-4dcb-a643-74fb760e83d4</guid><dc:creator>Mike Cichy</dc:creator><description>What it means is that the DB changes that are related to each other should be implemented together, rather than piecemeal. For example, you cannot add a column that references a PK in a table that has not been created yet.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>