Disabled in dropdown

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:18:06 GMT

This is fixed. This is what I did.

I had a expression rule which returns the record by its ID. I used a local variable which uses this expression rule. ( so this stores the initial value from the DB) In the dropdown field, I configured "disabled" based on the value from the local variable.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 20:28:23 GMT

[quote userid="154541" url="~/discussions/f/user-interface/29173/disabled-in-dropdown/115369#115369"]I need the initial value to get stored. Based on which, I need to disable.[/quote]

Sorry, that's still super unclear. Can you write out, in a list of steps, what you are hoping the user's experience will be? When is "value from the external system" being loaded, and how (i asked this before)? What are you expecting "the initial value" to be, and what do you mean exactly by "get stored"?

for example, i'm hoping to see something looking like:

the user loads the task, at first the Dropdown appears but has no selections and is DISABLED
the user presses a button labelled "load external data" which sends an API call and gets back a list of results
the API call results are stored into local!myApiCallResults
the local!myApiCallResults will become selectable in the Dropdown Field
the user is able to make a selection from the results, and that value is stored into ri!myRecordType[dropdownSelection]
the dropdown should remain ENABLED, and the user can continue changing their selections, prior to SUBMIT being pressed.

The above is a sequence I invented, and I intend it to be vaguely similar to your use case (per what I can discern from my point of view and details given so far), but with an assumption that I've gotten certain details wrong / backwards / etc.

This is the amount of detail we need from you here in order to tell precisely what the User Experience is intended to be, with further details specifying exactly how and why the current experience is not matching what you had hoped for.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:33:50 GMT

I am getting a value from the external system. I need the initial value to get stored. Based on which, I need to disable. Hope I answered your question

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:01:01 GMT

Can you clarify exaclty what information you're getting from the external system, how, and when? Stefan seems to have figured out something here but I'm still a little fuzzy with respect to what the desired sequence of events is, and the shape of the data.

What are you storing at first, and why?

When you say "when I store in the local variable", what information are you referring to being stored there?

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:54:27 GMT

yeah, exactly this is my requirement. So when I store in the local variable should I store the field name alone?

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:42:12 GMT

You cannot combine that logic into one value. Let's dissect that.

You have a dropdown. In case you get a value from the external system, this value shall be disabled. Correct? So, you will have to check the data as it comes in and, in a separate local variable, define whether to disable that field. Then use that for the disabled parameter.

Then you can use the actual record field just for the purpose it is meant for. Store the selected value.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:38:52 GMT

[quote userid="154541" url="~/discussions/f/user-interface/29173/disabled-in-dropdown/115361#115361"]But I want to remain it as a editable field [/quote]

So if you remove / comment the "disabled" parameter, it will remain editable. What is your intention behind disabling it conditionally?

a!dropdownField(
  label: "dropdown",
  choiceLabels: {},
  choiceValues: {},
  value: ri!record[fieldname],
  saveInto: ri!record[fieldname],
  disabled: false(),   /* this can either be "false()" or just removed if you never need it to be disabled */
  required: true()
)

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:37:01 GMT

In my case, when I pull the data from the external system the field is blank. So the user can select the value from the dropdown. But once after I select a value from a dropdown, it's getting disabled ( I think it's because it checks the condition isnotnullorempty and it's getting disabled). But I want to remain it as a editable field ( since the data from the external system is blank)

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:33:49 GMT

My requirement here is, I pull the data from the external system. After pulling the data, when I view the record somteimes the dropdown field might get a value from the external system and sometimes it will be empty.
If the field is empty, then the user can select values from the dropdown. If the field is not empty (populated by the external system) then I want to disable the field, so that user can change the value

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:32:55 GMT

[quote userid="59361" url="~/discussions/f/user-interface/29173/disabled-in-dropdown/115357#115357"]Why do you make disabled depending on whether a value is selected?[/quote]

I'd ask it this way: what is the actual behavior you're wanting, and in exactly what way is your current implementation failing to do what you want? I can't quite tell either of these things based on your original post.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:30:47 GMT

[quote userid="59361" url="~/discussions/f/user-interface/29173/disabled-in-dropdown/115355#115355"]Is that the real code? [/quote]

consider that Record Type code (when copied/pasted to plaintext) looks like incomprehensible gobbledygook - so most folks understandably obfuscate that stuff out. Sad that we have to resort to such measures just to post code here, but meh...

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:30:04 GMT

OK. Then I need to repeat my question. Why do you make disabled depending on whether a value is selected?

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:26:16 GMT

I didn;t mention the exact field here. But in my code I am referring to the dropdown field

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:21:11 GMT

Is that the real code? Line 11 does not look correct.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:19:40 GMT

a!dropdownField(
  label: "dropdown",
  choiceLabels: {},
  choiceValues: {},
  value: ri!record[fieldname],
  saveInto: ri!record[fieldname],
  disabled: {
    if(
      and(
        a!isNullOrEmpty(
          ri!record[],
          
        ),
        local!isValueAvailable
      ),
      false,
      true
    ),
    
  },
  required: true
)

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Mike Schmitt — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:16:38 GMT

Please share your code for the entire dropdown. And as Stefan mentioned, please use a Code Box to enable us to see proper formatting and indentation.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:58:14 GMT

disabled: {
if(
and(
a!isNullOrEmpty(
ri!record[] ),

local!isvalueavailable),
false,
true
),

},

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:54:28 GMT

Can you share the code snippet of that dropdown?

RE: Disabled in dropdown

hema.mathivathanan — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:51:16 GMT

not based on the selected value. sometimes the field will be populated will a record is created and sometimes not.

RE: Disabled in dropdown

Stefan Helzle — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 17:49:40 GMT

This is confusing me! Why do you want to disable the field based on whether the selected value is null?