Record type fields and Interface relation

Hi all,

Our application has about 80 interfaces - small pages/lists/dialogs to do various things.

We also defined about 25 record types with some that have reached 100 fields (max limit)

What would be the recommended approach?

1 - try to keep 1 to 1 relation between interface to record type - many small record types with only the fields that are needed directly by the interfaces and related rules

OR

2 - try to have only a few massive record types - with max amount of columns/fields and reuse across many interfaces - generic massive rules that selects anything with a million filtering options

thank you

  Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible