I have record which has " created on "field. I wanted to filter all records that is created for this year. But when I try to convert the created on field to year for comparison. It shows error.
Expression evaluation error at function a!queryRecordType: Could not cast from Record Field to Date. Details: CastInvalidCould not cast from Record Field to Date. Details: CastInvalid
Any help is appreciated
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
Can you share a few more details? Code snippets?
Did you consider to use a custom record field that just holds the year part of that date?
Hi kowsalyavijayan ,
You can create a custom record field 'year' using extract partial dates template and refer this new custom field to filter the data that is created for this year.
Hello kowsalyavijayan,
Create a custom record field shown as belowSelect the field where your Date and Time value exists
Then Create a user filter from the Filters in a expression mode
Here's a code snippet if needed for reference, replace the field here with your custom record field value and test it out.
a!localVariables( local!year:a!queryRecordType( recordType: 'recordType!{55d40bd2-3986-4477-bd9f-627d5a979404}STE Asset Request', fields: a!aggregationFields( groupings: { a!grouping( field: 'recordType!{55d40bd2-3986-4477-bd9f-627d5a979404}STE Asset Request.fields.{0c614836-7916-4250-acf6-a19403f6dd18}raisedonYear', alias: "year" ) } ), pagingInfo: a!pagingInfo(startIndex: 1,batchSize: 5000) ).data, a!recordFilterList( name: "Year", options: a!forEach( items: index(local!year,"year",""), expression: a!recordFilterListOption( id: fv!index, name: fv!item, filter: a!queryFilter( field: 'recordType!{55d40bd2-3986-4477-bd9f-627d5a979404}STE Asset Request.fields.{0c614836-7916-4250-acf6-a19403f6dd18}raisedonYear', operator: "=", value: fv!item ) ) ) ) )
Below is the outcome of the above
I don't understand the audacity of these people creating accounts and making such post on a platform which is completely dedicated to Technical knowledge sharing. I think there should be more aggressive measures on such accounts.