Appian Community
Site
Search
Sign In/Register
Site
Search
User
DISCUSS
LEARN
SUCCESS
SUPPORT
Documentation
AppMarket
More
Cancel
I'm looking for ...
State
Not Answered
Replies
8 replies
Subscribers
11 subscribers
Views
2344 views
Users
0 members are here
Share
More
Cancel
Related Discussions
Home
»
Discussions
»
Data and Records
Hi all, We are running into issues with the Default Filter on Records
jonathanr67
over 9 years ago
Hi all,
We are running into issues with the Default Filter on Records on 7.7. Hoping to hear some viable workarounds…
Background:
One of our record-backed case-management stye applications is approaching the limits of the # of parameters SQL Server can accept (2100 is the default). The app grown 2-3 times faster than we originally anticipated, so our plan for archiving requests after Xyears is no longer valid.
For the Record’s Default Filter, we are using the IN clause (eg. caseID IN (1,2,3...3000)). Very similar to the best practise recommended at:
forum.appian.com/.../Record_Level_Security_for_Entity_Backed_Records_Best_Practice.html
, (but we are not creating an Appian group per request... we can determine viewer rights based on a View we query).
Record security required:
- Requestors and Approvers can view requests that they are involved in.
- Business Admin’s can view ALL requests <<< It is here where use of the IN clause wi...
OriginalPostID-154122
OriginalPostID-154122
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
Parents
0
jonathanr67
over 9 years ago
... clearly and accurately!
Regards,
JR
Note 1: Ideally we do not want to use multiple record types eg. ‘Inflight records’ and ‘Archived’ records.
Note 2: With newer builds we are advising stakeholders of the current limitation in advance so they can plan around it.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Reply
0
jonathanr67
over 9 years ago
... clearly and accurately!
Regards,
JR
Note 1: Ideally we do not want to use multiple record types eg. ‘Inflight records’ and ‘Archived’ records.
Note 2: With newer builds we are advising stakeholders of the current limitation in advance so they can plan around it.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Children
No Data