HI ALL#User Filter

@praveenkumark To the best of my knowledge, there isn't a direct and clean solution for it and you can try to work around it to SOME extent as follows:

1. Let's say you have a variable of type Text and multiple called listOfCountry_txt. Create a new PV of type Text and single and store the listOfCountry_txt into this new PV in the process model while you are updating the listOfCountry_txt. The definition of new PV, lets call it as country_txt, should be fn!joinarray(pv!listOfCountry_txt,";")

2. Create an Expression-based User filter as follows:
a!facet(
name: "Some name",
options: {
a!facetOption(
id: 1,
name: "Country",
filter: a!queryFilter(
field: "country_txt",
operator: "includes",
value: "Australia"
)
),
\ta!facetOption(
id: 2,
name: "Country",
filter: a!queryFilter(
field: "country_txt",
operator: "includes",
value: "UK"
)
)
},
isVisible: true
)
3. Configure the filter created in the above step in the Record Type.

Test and see how it goes. I should say that you need to ensure its reliability(in terms of getting back the results based on the filter) upon rigorous testing.

@praveenkumark To the best of my knowledge, there isn't a direct and clean solution for it and you can try to work around it to SOME extent as follows:

1. Let's say you have a variable of type Text and multiple called listOfCountry_txt. Create a new PV of type Text and single and store the listOfCountry_txt into this new PV in the process model while you are updating the listOfCountry_txt. The definition of new PV, lets call it as country_txt, should be fn!joinarray(pv!listOfCountry_txt,";")

2. Create an Expression-based User filter as follows:
a!facet(
name: "Some name",
options: {
a!facetOption(
id: 1,
name: "Country",
filter: a!queryFilter(
field: "country_txt",
operator: "includes",
value: "Australia"
)
),
\ta!facetOption(
id: 2,
name: "Country",
filter: a!queryFilter(
field: "country_txt",
operator: "includes",
value: "UK"
)
)
},
isVisible: true
)
3. Configure the filter created in the above step in the Record Type.

Test and see how it goes. I should say that you need to ensure its reliability(in terms of getting back the results based on the filter) upon rigorous testing.