Appian Community
Site
Search
Sign In/Register
Site
Search
User
DISCUSS
LEARN
SUCCESS
SUPPORT
Documentation
AppMarket
More
Cancel
I'm looking for ...
State
Not Answered
Replies
4 replies
Subscribers
7 subscribers
Views
2159 views
Users
0 members are here
Share
More
Cancel
Related Discussions
Home
»
Discussions
»
General
I'm trying to export my application and am getting one strange error:
robbier
over 9 years ago
I'm trying to export my application and am getting one strange error:
datatype 3134 {
brookfielddev.appiancloud.com/.../}MyCDT^2:
The data for datatype [id=3134 uuid={https://brookfielddev.appiancloud.com/suite/types/}MyCDT^2] could not be retrieved for export. Cause: com.appiancorp.type.DeactivatedTypeException: com.appiancorp.suiteapi.common.exceptions.AppianException: Invalid Type: null (APNX-1-4047-000) (APNX-1-4071-002)
Right now I'm way up to version 8 of MyCDT--this is an old reference. Furthermore, when I run impact analysis it indicates all dependent objects are fine. I also personally went through each of the dependent items to make sure there was no older reference.
Anyone ever see an old datatype reference error like this?
OriginalPostID-157349
OriginalPostID-157349
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
Parents
0
robbier
over 9 years ago
I'm on 7.9.
That's a great point and at one point I was in the process model referencing the related entity type in a couple of Write To Datastore nodes. However, at some point I switched over to using a constant value for this.
Considering that it was a very old version of the CDT (i.e. CDT^2) and we're up to version 8 or 9 of the CDT I'm guessing it was something like that.
At least if this happens again I have another rock to turn over. :)
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Reply
0
robbier
over 9 years ago
I'm on 7.9.
That's a great point and at one point I was in the process model referencing the related entity type in a couple of Write To Datastore nodes. However, at some point I switched over to using a constant value for this.
Considering that it was a very old version of the CDT (i.e. CDT^2) and we're up to version 8 or 9 of the CDT I'm guessing it was something like that.
At least if this happens again I have another rock to turn over. :)
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Children
No Data