Appian Community
Site
Search
Sign In/Register
Site
Search
User
DISCUSS
LEARN
SUCCESS
SUPPORT
Documentation
AppMarket
More
Cancel
I'm looking for ...
State
Not Answered
Replies
9 replies
Subscribers
8 subscribers
Views
2785 views
Users
0 members are here
Share
More
Cancel
Related Discussions
Home
»
Discussions
»
General
Limitation on missing dependencies in an application
aayusha
Certified Senior Developer
over 7 years ago
I have a process model (A) with an script task, and in the output node I have used a rule inside an apply. For example, apply(rule!doSomething,pv!myArray).
Now when I create a package process model (A), and check for missing precedents this rule (rule!doSomething) does not appear.
However, if I check the precedents of the process model, I get this rule in the list.
Is there any limitations on the missing precedents functionality?
What if we use the apply in interface, would missing precedents ignore that or is it just with process models?
OriginalPostID-245204
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
Parents
0
aayusha
Certified Senior Developer
over 7 years ago
@abhinavg712 @Tom, shouldn't the missing precedents work in both ways?
I understand the method mentioned by abhinavg712 will work, but ideally I think it should work both ways.
@Tom, is it a known thing? Or can we raise an enhancement on this?
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Reply
0
aayusha
Certified Senior Developer
over 7 years ago
@abhinavg712 @Tom, shouldn't the missing precedents work in both ways?
I understand the method mentioned by abhinavg712 will work, but ideally I think it should work both ways.
@Tom, is it a known thing? Or can we raise an enhancement on this?
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
Children
No Data