Populate Choice Values in Dropdown from Record - is it possible?

Hi sebastians0002,

You can try a code similar to the below one:

a!localVariables(
  local!a: a!queryRecordType(
    recordType: 'recordType!BTM Cost Center',
    pagingInfo: a!pagingInfo(1,500)
  ).data,
  local!b,
  {
  a!dropdownField(
    value: local!b,
    placeholder: "Please select",
    choiceLabels: index(local!a, 'recordType!BTM Cost Center.fields.CostCenterLabel',null),
    choiceValues:  index(local!a, 'recordType!BTM Cost Center.fields.CostCenterId',null),
  )

  }
)

This code it is not fully working as I tried to mock up your recordType, so you will need to adjust these bits, but if what your were looking for was to display the CostCenterLabel and store the CostCenterId, the concept is in there.

Regards,

Acacio B.

Hi Acacio Barrado,

thanks for the help. I noticed I was really just missing the index function so I did the following:

a!dropdownField(
  label: "Cost Center",
  labelPosition: "ABOVE",
  placeholder: "--- Select a Value ---",
  choiceLabels: index(
    a!queryRecordType(
    recordType: 'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter',
    fields: 'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter.fields.{8abcfd37-4d60-4002-ad88-ab282d3ed5a1}costcenterlabel',
    pagingInfo: a!pagingInfo(startIndex: 1, batchSize: 500)
  ).data,
    'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter.fields.{8abcfd37-4d60-4002-ad88-ab282d3ed5a1}costcenterlabel',
    null()
  )
,
  choiceValues: index(
    a!queryRecordType(
    recordType: 'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter',
    fields: 'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter.fields.{88b6b0f8-52e0-46d0-8613-21d91da4b473}costcenterid',
    pagingInfo: a!pagingInfo(startIndex: 1, batchSize: 500)
  ).data,
    'recordType!{b106c553-3b20-4906-bfdc-16b9ce3c420d}BTM CostCenter.fields.{88b6b0f8-52e0-46d0-8613-21d91da4b473}costcenterid',
    null()
  ),
  value: ri!record.costcenterid,
  saveInto: ri!record.costcenterid,
  searchDisplay: "AUTO",
  validations: {}
)

I highly recommend to store the results of your queryRecordType into a local variable. This will be easier to maintain and faster because the query has to be executed only once. Follow the example from Arcadio.

I highly recommend to store the results of your queryRecordType into a local variable. This will be easier to maintain and faster because the query has to be executed only once. Follow the example from Arcadio.