Hello all,
So I have a process, where the stakeholder wants to handle a feature more restrictively.
So before starting a process prompt a new question. ( I already have an interface working fine, but with the new requirements should I create a new one with the questions ?)
What you would like to amend? ( I already have an interface working fine, but with the new requirements should I create a new one with the questions ?)
Distribution Fee amount only (->only Distribution Fee should be editable)
-> process works the same as before, BUT once approved and processed by Documentation the task does NOT go back to other team in the end anymore
KID, Target Market, Cost&Charges only (->only these fields should be editable)
-> process works the same as before, BUT once approved and processed by Documentation the task does NOT go back to the other team in the end anymore
Others (might include the above ones) (all editable)-> normal process
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
I am sorry but I am still figuring out the exact requirement here. Could you please confirm if you want to add multiple options to restrict certain fields in the form?
correct, sorry couldn't explain in a better way.
in this case you can use readonly parameter of those fields to conditionally make then editable or readonly.
how should I then give the choice between 3 options ?
You can have 3 variables to store boolean values and then based on these values you can configure your readOnly parameters.
thank you very much
now I can add one extra read only, what should be the best practtce here.
like something ( if(ri!isKidOnly, true, false) ) to make only readable if that is the option selected
i did not understand your question properly . If you want to add one more condition then you can use nested "If" condition.
hi victoria,to add conditions you can extend the "or" or and an "and" thats more part of the mathematical "logic"examples
if( or( local!var=1, local!var=2, local!var=3, local!var=4 ), true ...... ) ___________________________________ if( and( or( local!var01=.....; local!var07=.... ), or(), or() ), true, .... ) ________________________________ if( or( and(), and(), or(), local!var99=..... ), true, .... )
i have one best practiseif( ri!whatever, true, false)makes no sense as the value of r!whatever is already true or false. so stay with just with"ri!whatever" instead of the whole "if(....,true,false)" thing.
Thank you very much. It helped