Normally user should not been able to complete the task (of sub-process) after t

amitm over 10 years ago

Normally user should not been able to complete the task (of sub-process) after the main process instance has been terminated. But I found it surprising that sometimes a user is able to accept and complete the task (but no further node) AFTER the termination of process instance. Can anyone help to understand the actual reason?

Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible

Parents

0 amitm over 10 years ago

We have functionality where user can close the running case any-time via related action. This will 'Terminate' the process from back-end. If a task note is active that time (in a synchronous sub-process) should be aborted.
This is happening normally, but we noticed few times the user input task allow assigned user to accept and submit (surprising) but not moving next node further (which is expected).
Hope now you got the scenario.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 amitm over 10 years ago

We have functionality where user can close the running case any-time via related action. This will 'Terminate' the process from back-end. If a task note is active that time (in a synchronous sub-process) should be aborted.
This is happening normally, but we noticed few times the user input task allow assigned user to accept and submit (surprising) but not moving next node further (which is expected).
Hope now you got the scenario.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

No Data