Appian Community
Site
Search
Sign In/Register
Site
Search
User
DISCUSS
LEARN
SUCCESS
SUPPORT
Documentation
AppMarket
More
Cancel
I'm looking for ...
State
Not Answered
Replies
6 replies
Subscribers
7 subscribers
Views
2064 views
Users
0 members are here
Share
More
Cancel
Related Discussions
Home
»
Discussions
»
General
Package Deployment - If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a
SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
Certified Associate Developer
over 8 years ago
Package Deployment -
If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { array }) inside a script node output, then Appian Designer feature Missing Precedents doesn’t find the rule yourRuleName as precedents.
Is there any particular reason for this ?
OriginalPostID-183085
OriginalPostID-183085
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
0
Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies
over 8 years ago
This is a known issue. I believe it has been fixed in more recent releases. What version are you on?
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
0
Josh
Certified Lead Developer
over 8 years ago
If you use the syntax fn!apply(rule!yourRuleName(_), {array}) then yourRuleName will be picked up as a precedent.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
0
sikhivahans
over 8 years ago
Has it got some thing to do with syntax error? I remember reading in the documentation somewhere that the syntax errors results in inability to trace relationships. @joshl seems to be right as per my knowledge.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
0
SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
Certified Associate Developer
over 8 years ago
We are using 7.10 & i have tried apply(rule!test, {"a","b"}), and it doesn't find rule!test as precedent for that application having only PM.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
0
Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies
over 8 years ago
Perhaps it hasn't been fixed. Regardless, Josh is correct, the rule will show up in Missing Precedents if you use his syntax.
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel
0
SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
Certified Associate Developer
over 8 years ago
yes, got it now. @joshi your syntax works :)
Cancel
Vote Up
0
Vote Down
Sign in to reply
Verify Answer
Cancel