Package Deployment - If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a

SANTOSH S KUNDLIK

Certified Associate Developer

over 10 years ago

Package Deployment -

If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { array }) inside a script node output, then Appian Designer feature Missing Precedents doesn’t find the rule yourRuleName as precedents.

Is there any particular reason for this ?

Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible

0 Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies over 10 years ago

This is a known issue. I believe it has been fixed in more recent releases. What version are you on?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 Josh
Certified Lead Developer
over 10 years ago

If you use the syntax fn!apply(rule!yourRuleName(_), {array}) then yourRuleName will be picked up as a precedent.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 sikhivahans over 10 years ago

Has it got some thing to do with syntax error? I remember reading in the documentation somewhere that the syntax errors results in inability to trace relationships. @joshl seems to be right as per my knowledge.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
Certified Associate Developer
over 10 years ago

We are using 7.10 & i have tried apply(rule!test, {"a","b"}), and it doesn't find rule!test as precedent for that application having only PM.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies over 10 years ago

Perhaps it hasn't been fixed. Regardless, Josh is correct, the rule will show up in Missing Precedents if you use his syntax.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
Certified Associate Developer
over 10 years ago

yes, got it now. @joshi your syntax works :)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel