Package Deployment - If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { a

SANTOSH S KUNDLIK

A Score Level 2

over 8 years ago

Package Deployment -

If we are having fn!appy (rule!yourRuleName, { array }) inside a script node output, then Appian Designer feature Missing Precedents doesn’t find the rule yourRuleName as precedents.

Is there any particular reason for this ?

Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible

0 Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies over 8 years ago

This is a known issue. I believe it has been fixed in more recent releases. What version are you on?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 Josh
Certified Lead Developer
over 8 years ago

If you use the syntax fn!apply(rule!yourRuleName(_), {array}) then yourRuleName will be picked up as a precedent.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 sikhivahans over 8 years ago

Has it got some thing to do with syntax error? I remember reading in the documentation somewhere that the syntax errors results in inability to trace relationships. @joshl seems to be right as per my knowledge.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
A Score Level 2
over 8 years ago

We are using 7.10 & i have tried apply(rule!test, {"a","b"}), and it doesn't find rule!test as precedent for that application having only PM.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 Jacob Cohen - Project Leader - Macedon Technologies over 8 years ago

Perhaps it hasn't been fixed. Regardless, Josh is correct, the rule will show up in Missing Precedents if you use his syntax.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel
0 SANTOSH S KUNDLIK
A Score Level 2
over 8 years ago

yes, got it now. @joshi your syntax works :)
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel