I am using connected system with Oauth2.0 to connect to office365 and get the calendars i m able to authorize using connected system however when testing the base url I get the below error
Appian was not able to authenticate with the access token you provided. This request requires Bearer authentication. HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized Next Steps
When i run the authorization its executes successfully. Has any one seen this issue before or can someone share the Oauth2.0 configuration related to outlook ( For outlook defining a scope is mandatory)
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
You mention wanting to use the implicit grant flow, but Appian Connected System OAuth 2.0 in 18.3 supports authorization code grant flow. This could explain your issue. If you are planning on treating this integration like a service account, I recommend the client credentials grant type, which is designed for these scenarios. To do this in Appian 18.3 you can create two Appian Integration objects: one that requests the token and one that uses the token for the actual request. As announced during the 18.4 webinar, Appian will have a specific feature for client credentials grant type configuration in 18.4 as well. Also, I recommend moving towards Microsoft Graph REST APIs rather than Office 365 REST APIs. This is because when using the client credentials grant type with Office 365 REST APIs, Microsoft requires you to register an x509 cert with the application and sign API calls with it via a JWT. This is a pain to set up in Azure and requires a plugin in Appian. Meanwhile, Microsoft Graph APIs require none of that and are much easier to set up. The only reason my implementation had to do all this for Office 365 is because the "Find Meeting Times" API in Graph has a bug that has gone unfixed for years, while the "Find Meeting Times" API in Office 365 works fine. If you don't need that service, go with Graph!
You have to build the details (url, parameters, body) of the 2 requests yourself. Integrations can be created outside connected systems so I recommend starting with that. For both of them you will select "None" for authentication since you will be configuring the token exchange yourself. This method below requests a new bearer token every call. You could also cache the token in the database for re-use, but we decided against that method in favor of this one to limit the exposure of where the token is accessible.
Integration 1 - Getting the bearer token
make sure to lock down the security on these constants to admins only
Integration 2 - Making a request using this token
URL/parameters/body: This is whatever Graph REST API you are trying to use
Headers: Authorization - "Bearer "&rule!MG_ws_getGraphBearerTokenQ().result.body.access_token
In this case, rule!MG_ws_getGraphBearerTokenQ() is what we configured in "Integration 1"
The Integration details for #2 are completely dependent on what Graph REST API you are trying to call and the format that API expects. You will have to read the Graph API documentation. I showed you the headers section which is important because that is how you pass the token.
But here is an example:
Hi Steve. Great info here. We are implementing this in Appian 19.2 using a connected system but it seems that we need to use an authorization link to obtain the token. This is an extra step for our users and needs to be repeated after each time the token expires. Is there any other approach that will not require the users to authorize every time? Do we just need to increase the token expiration value?
My write-up above is for the OAuth 2.0 Client Credentials grant type (which Appian now has a feature to handle OOTB rather than doing the 2 calls by hand: https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/19.2/oauth_client_credentials.html). This is for system to system (service account) type interactions. The system takes care of token retrieval and refresh; the user never knows). Also, Appian has access to all the data in the external system and decides who to show it to on Appian interfaces based on their Appian groups.
You seem to be talking about something different. Per-user authorization using authorization links is called OAuth 2.0 Auth Code grant type (which Appian also has features for: https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/19.2/Oauth_connected_system.html). This is what you are describing. If you go with this option, you HAVE to have the user manually authorize Appian to act on their behalf the first time and each time the token expires. That is how OAuth is designed and with good reason.
© 2021 Appian. All rights reserved.