Hi all, I'm getting a response from plugin something like below: 1

You can use merge function on your input arrays.

could you please provide a sample.

merge({1,2,3,4,5},{"A","B","C","D","E"})

apply(rule!urrule,merge({1;2;3;4;5},{A,B,C,D,E},{thirdarray}) hope this should work

Hi harshav,
What should the custom rule contain in this case?
With the above example I'm getting a long array but again how to distinguish between each record that I'm looking for i.e.,
{{1,A,IL},{2,B,NC},{3,C,SC}}

I know we are almost there but something is missing.

Inputs please....

try to use index over these.

I'm getting a long array as below:
1, A, IL, 2, B, NC, 3, C, SC, 4, D, TX, 5, E, IN

How can I get to know that 1,A,IL is one record then 2,B,NC is the second one and so on.

I believe the solutions above are almost correct. Create a supporting rule (eg rule!myRule) that accepts three inputs, and that does:

{
          ri!input1,
          ri!input2,
          ri!input3
}

Then do the following:

apply(
          rule!myRule,
          merge(
                    {1,2,3,4,5},
                    {A,B,C,D,E},
                    {IL,NC,SC,TX,IN}
          )
)

Note that if you try to display the result of the apply() above, you'll see it as a flat array, as you've essentially returned an array of arrays and the expression editor can't display that any other way. To see only the first element, try wrapping the apply() in an index(<apply>,1,{}) - you should see {1,A,IL}.

Alternatively, you may wish to have the supporting rule do this:

concat(
          ri!input1,
          ";",
          ri!input2,
          ";",
          ri!input3
)

that helped... thanks...