Input map
local!inputMap:{ a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Appian",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:15, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"VB",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:12, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Java",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:25, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"COBOL",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:45, docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"PL1",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:55, docid:2)},
Desired output map
local!outputMap :{ a!map(pagenum: 1 , Name: "Appian", howold: 15, docid:1),
a!map(pagenum: 1 , Name: "VB", howold: 12, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2 , Name: "Java", howold: 25, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1 , Name: "COBOL", howold: 45, docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2 , Name: "PL1", howold: 55, docid:2)},
Is this possible ?
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
For the updated input map, this change in the Stefan's code should work
a!localVariables( local!input:{ a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Appian",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:15, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Java",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:25, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"COBOL",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:45, docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"PL1",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:55, docid:2) }, local!uniqueDocRows: a!forEach( union(local!input.docid,local!input.docid), index( local!input, where(local!input.docid = fv!item), {} ) ), a!flatten(a!forEach( local!uniqueDocRows, a!localVariables( local!parentItem: fv!item, a!forEach( items: union(fv!item.pagenum, fv!item.pagenum), expression: a!localVariables( local!rows: index(local!parentItem, where(local!parentItem.pagenum = fv!item), {}), reduce( a!update(_, _, _), a!map(pagenum: fv!item), merge({local!rows.fieldname,"docid"}, {local!rows.fieldValue, union(local!rows.docid, local!rows.docid)}) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ps: Wait for Stefan to post the updated solution with better and less complex logic
Sanchita Gupta Your solution works but it skips first 2 rows , can't see a!map(pagenum: 1 , Name: "Appian", howold: 15, docid:1),in the output
How will it work if you keep on changing inputMap in the question again and again after we post a solution and don't even let us know about that???
For others to know, this was the inputMap updated by you when I answered (for which it works perfectly), before that when Stefan answered it was something else.
From the current map how can you identify that howold:15 is related to Name: "Appian" and not Name: "VB"?
If this list of map is going to remain in the same order i.e., "howold" map will come after every "Name" map, then this code can help.
a!localVariables( local!input:{ a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Appian",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:15, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"VB",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:12, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"Java",docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:25, docid:1), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"COBOL",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 1,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:45, docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "Name", fieldValue:"PL1",docid:2), a!map(pagenum: 2,fieldname: "howold", fieldValue:55, docid:2) }, local!uniqueDocRows: a!forEach( union(local!input.docid,local!input.docid), index( local!input, where(local!input.docid = fv!item), {} ) ), a!flatten(a!forEach( local!uniqueDocRows, a!localVariables( local!parentItem: fv!item, a!forEach( items: union(fv!item.pagenum, fv!item.pagenum), expression: a!localVariables( local!Pagenum: fv!item, local!rows: index(local!parentItem, where(local!parentItem.pagenum = fv!item), {}), local!NameRows: index(local!rows,wherecontains("Name", local!rows.fieldname),null), local!howoldRows: index(local!rows,wherecontains("howold", local!rows.fieldname),null), local!finalRows: merge(local!NameRows, local!howoldRows), a!forEach( local!finalRows, reduce( a!update(_, _, _), a!map(pagenum: local!Pagenum), merge({fv!item.fieldname,"docid"}, {fv!item.fieldValue, union(fv!item.docid, fv!item.docid)}) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
It also might help to explain the purpose of this. Then we can develop a more generic algorithm. This feels like you want to translate a list of key-values into a column format.
Thanks, that fixed it. Sorry the requirements changed and I had to modify inputmap.
@stefan , use case is if u scan a set of documents with multiple pages where u want to extract certain matching key-value pairs ..e.g. document 1 , with 2 pages has multiple matches of certain key/value pairs in terms of fieldName/fieldvalue on page 1 and page 2 ..
You just sent an email to some Sanchita Gupta twice in a row stating that he/she has been mentioned in this thread which they don't even have any clue about.
Also, it helps if you can mark the answer as verified