In a queryentity function, in an interface, I'm getting an error like "Unexpected error executing query (type: [CPVAccountsStatementTrackerDT8331], query:[queryentity expression], order by: [[Sort[FinancialInstitutionOther asc]]], filters:[(firmId = TypedValue[it=1,v=-1)])". How should I resolve this error. In one of filters, we are filtering based on -1 but this is working in some environment while failing at some.
Discussion posts and replies are publicly visible
Hi swapnilk0010 , can you share your code. So that will try to tell and resolve your issue.
a!queryEntity_22r2(
entity:cons!CP_DSE_V_STATEMENT_TRACKER,
query:a!query(
pagingInfo:a!pagingInfo(
startIndex:1,
batchSize:-1),
selection:a!querySelection(
columns:a!queryColumn(field: "financialInstitutionother",alias:"FinancialInstitutionOther",visible:true()),
logicalExpression:a!queryLogicalExpression(
ignoreFilterWithEmptyValues:true(),
filters:{a!queryFilter(
field: "firmId",
operator:"=",
value:-1)
}
)))
This error message typically points towards a timeout issue.
And ...
Yeah what happens if you don't use -1 for your batch size? In general I recommend against using -1 for batch size in almost any scenario, because it returns all of your data, which can easily run into timeouts, the circuit breaker, or just poor performance.
How can we resolve this because I am going to need all this values for a drop down?
Thanks Stefen for suggestion. Can you also suggest how we can resolve this issue? The values queries using this expression is going to be used for a drop down. So, I'm going to need it.
Sorry, to say that, but no, you don't. Putting such a large number of items in a drop down does not result in a great UX. I suggest to use a picker field instead.
And then, in that constant, I see the letter "V". Does this indicate that you try to query a database view? Views are notoriously known for bad performance. If you need to use this view, you will have to find a way to speed it up.
Agreed with Stefan - there has to be some limit, right? What if you had 1 million values - surely you wouldn't want to load all of those values into a dropdown? Usually a dropdown is good within the dozens to low hundreds - if you have more than that, either using cascading dropdowns or a picker is a better approach.