Skip to main content
April 18, 2024
Question

rv!record is empty, data does not come through to summary page

  • April 18, 2024
  • 10 replies
  • 1 view

I've config a summary page in record type, the interface be like rule!BCD_userDetails(userDetails: rv!record). But when I click on record link the summary page has no data populated, seems rv!record has no value in it

    10 replies

    karumurua531442
    April 18, 2024

    Hi [mention:2aea1bf0b6954f94815518e79da990c7:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05]  Could you please share more about  your record configurations please,

    shubhama926776
    Brainy
    April 18, 2024

    [mention:2aea1bf0b6954f94815518e79da990c7:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] Based on limited information provided, check below points
    1) Check source in record type, ensure data is flowing through rv!record.
    2) Verify rule!BCD_userDetails uses rv!record type variable to access data.

    Check you are able to see the data preview for that record.

    April 19, 2024

    Thank you for your advice! It turned out that I have nested interface in my record page so the rv!record somehow failed, I use rv!identifier to query instead and it worked.

    konduruc733182
    April 18, 2024

    Hello [mention:2aea1bf0b6954f94815518e79da990c7:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] 

    I would recommend using the identifier instead of passing the rv!record as input. Use the identifier to fetch the data in the interface.

    April 19, 2024

    Thank you! Exactly, I used identifier to query and worked

    mikes0011
    Brainy
    April 18, 2024

    If there's any chance this is an older record type, it might not be sufficient to pass in just "rv!record".  In newer ones it is, as long as the "userDetails" rule input is an instance of the correct record type.

    April 19, 2024

    Thank you for reply. Not sure if that is the cause, I used identifier instead and it worked, but still don't understand why rv!record failed

    harshk1671
    April 19, 2024

    As Mike mentioned already this can be an older record type. Try passing in the following way instead of passing rv!record.

    If you want to pass any relationship then define that as well.

    ravip208227
    February 16, 2025

    I don't know why this problem is with just this record for me,
    but this way will work if you don't want to change in your interfaces and processes

    stefanhelzle0001
    February 16, 2025

    I tried to cover this topic in this blog post: https://appian.rocks/2024/01/16/partially-populated-records/