Skip to main content
G
girlc0001
May 9, 2024
Question

Redirect Intial Interface

  • May 9, 2024
  • 8 replies
  • 0 views

Hello

I need advice .As my requirement after registered data to database and redirect register form.

below is my process model flow.

which flow is better and good for redirect interface.

Is there any other method other than the Flow I implemented?

Thanks

8 replies

konduruc733182
konduruc733182
May 9, 2024

Hello [mention:4187e9f2c0404e4aa25182e3f69c4c03:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] 

If it is just to display I would suggest simply use a interface next to the write records. Your second model will not show you the Interface anyway. The first one would write the data again if not handled well.

G
girlc0001Author
May 9, 2024

 [mention:2df2892a4df7486f9775b4d2f0e405fd:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] 

Thank you for your reply. 

My requirement is after registered data i need to display register form again . if there is no user action  terminate the process model .

my second model  show the interface again.

II'm  worried about a flow that calls the same process model again in a subprocess is a good idea.

Is there no other way to redirect initial interface?

mikes0011
mikes0011
Brainy
May 9, 2024

What are you trying to accomplish?  When you say "redirect interface" what do you mean exactly?

G
girlc0001Author
May 9, 2024

[mention:b45a4f6a20b14a008e4e0ec732a8bf98:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] 

My requirement is after registered data i need to display register form again . if there is no user action  terminate the process model .

redirect interface means (plz reference screen shot)

I'm  worried about a flow that calls the same process model again in a subprocess is a good idea.

Is there no other way to redirect initial interface?

mikes0011
mikes0011
Brainy
May 9, 2024
after registered data i need to display register form again

Can you add any more detail about what the purpose is for displaying the register form again?  Are you allowing the original entered data to be changed (and saved over) or a purely new entry to be added?  Is the same user going to need to add several consecutive entries for instance?

The most common way would be to loop back to the initial task (chained, the user won't know much difference).  Be sure you provide the user a way of clicking "finished" or "close" or something like that when they have no additional entries to add (train them to not just "navigate away" if possible, though it's good to handle that case since some users inevitably will). 

The "call the same subprocess again" approach can *also* work, and has advantages and disadvantages.  The advantage is that the subprocess could potentially be updated to a new version even while the user is on the original task.  The drawback is that it's a bit more confusing to edit and to troubleshoot later.

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement