Skip to main content

10 replies

stefanhelzle0001
June 27, 2025

Tough question. We do not have any clue what you are doing... Can you share more details?

June 27, 2025

I am syncing data in batches with batch size of 1000  in a loop, so everytime 1000 ids will be stored in the pv!recordIds, but when i check in the history its only showing 101 items in the variable, does that mean only 101 items are synced or being passed  ?

stefanhelzle0001
June 27, 2025
does that mean only 101 items are synced or being passed

Probably yes. In such situations, I first try to very clearly define the expected behaviour. Then I check and test each and every involved component in a way I actually see that it supports my expectations.

June 27, 2025

I would expect the batchNumber variable to refer to a page number rather then a batch size

mikes0011
Brainy
June 27, 2025

If "batchNumber" is being used for the "batchSize" paging value in a query, and the (filtered) query returns only 101 items, then the results would only be 101 items regardless of whether the batchSize is larger.  Since we can't see the code you're using to query, or the data size, or the filters you're applying, it's hard to guess what might really be happening or why, as Stefan already mentioned.

June 30, 2025

from the query 1000 ids are generated ,I tested them , in PM also from variable tab 1000 ids are  being shown but in the history tab its showing 101 items

jitenders0006
New Participant
June 27, 2025

Please check how many rows, you were getting while querying, Is more than 1000 or 101,

Batch size 1000 means you can query 1000 rows at a time, but it depends on your query how many rows you are getting.

June 30, 2025

yes Im getting 1000 ids from my query rule.

December 12, 2025

I am actually also seeing this behavior in the process history tab, and I'm starting to think it's a bug. Checking the variables tab shows the correct amount in the CDT array, while the process history only shows 101 items. 

harshas2775
December 12, 2025

Just to understand this better - does history doesn’t show more entries for the cdt having 1000 rows in it? I am thinking that may be the last query returning 101 rows might be shown in latest cdt entry of history but prior to that there must be some cdt values of length 1000. Is it not the case?