-
Recently active
I have a read only grid interface whose source is record data (API backed record). Record holds 3 million data which is one time sync . If I need to implement two custom picker fields for two columns (ex: Year & Name, max selection is 5 ) and grid should reload even with combination filter as well. Please drop your suggestions to implement this without affecting the performance much.
I have requirement in which a user uploads a document while composing a comment. The uploaded document should be stored temporarily, and its ID held until the user submits the comment. If the comment is submitted, the document becomes permanent; otherwise, it should remain temporary.
Hi Team, I am trying to generate reports on processHQ. But due to the processHQ limitation on using one to many relationship records, I am unable to structure the report the way i wanted to do. Actual Idea: There is an approval flow, where one form will have multiple reviewers. From process HQ, I am expecting to prepare a report (record grid) where I show the formId and its multiple reviewers names. Limitation: Process HQ doesn't support using one to many relationship records. Any Idea, if there is any work around here, to accommodate the actual Idea. Acc to Appian Documentation, it suggested to use backward relation to turn one to many -> many to one, but this will not fit into my case as i have many other records to deal with ( few are one to many while few are many to one). I just want to know if anyone came across similar situation. If yes, may I your approach in solving this. Thankyou!
I am having a column named due On in the record with data type as date and time,In db the data type for this field is timestamp.I have to add a filter ,having two options one Before or at 7:59 PM Today and After 7:59 PM Today and display this filter and read only grid in a interfaceThis is the filter code I am writing currently,but it is not working correctly kindly help me regarding thisa!recordFilterList( name: "SLA Due Date", options: { a!recordFilterListOption( id: "before", name: "Before or at 7:59 PM Today", filter: a!queryFilter( field:'recordType!{ee5aa46d-0228-430f-a794-1134a11fbcc0}CMGT_Task.fields.{56f4ac00-4b4b-4c1b-b841-1938bd23ac80}dueOn', operator: "<=", value: rule!NWS_SlaCutOffTime(), ) ), a!recordFilterListOption( id: "after", name: "After 7:59 PM Today", filter: a!queryFilter( field:'recordType!{ee5aa46d-0228-430f-a794-1134a11fbcc0}CMGT_Task.fields.{56f4ac00-4b4b-
Hi I have a requirement I want to edit the prepopulated dropdown label name which will be coming from ref table and save that into other table. My first doubt is can we do that ?
Hi, Getting the following error in stdout logs, for some of the process models. Although process instances are being executed successfully. 2025-07-11 13:40:02,385 [Appian Work Item - 38719 - WorkID 637 - execution03 - process 6367361 - model 17 : EstablishProcessInstanceParentageRequest] ERROR com.appiancorp.naming.ShardRoutingServiceImpl - com.appiancorp.suiteapi.process.exceptions.InvalidObjectTypeIdException: Failed to fetch id block from Service Manager for type ACr and id -2147483648 Has anyone experienced this kind of error. Thanks.
Hi, Unable to open interface due to memory circuit breaker exception. Getting the following error - The Memory Circuit Breaker prevented this evaluation from completing due to insufficient resources. Unable to edit the interface. Is there a way to open the interface. Thanks.
As you can see above i have a list of jobs posted. And this view is the summary view as you might already know and i have an saperate action apply beside the job details tab which is for applying the candidate for the particular job. But when i click apply, the candidates that i have applied for other jobs also are visible. I want to know how can i use the queryfilter option so that when i come to the summary view of a particular job and click on apply i can only see the candidates that have applied for that particular job. Ex: I have a job posting called coforge with an job posting id of "00004" and when i go on its summary view i can see the whole job details and when i click on the apply tab , i should only see the candidates that have applied for the coforge job only. Is that possible using the queryfilter function. Please guide me through it.
I have read only grid backed by record type. Need to place download button using rich text icon in the grid which makes call to S3 using record action & gets presigned URL . Now user should be able to download the file and submit the form as well so that user land on Grid page with single click. Any suggestion to achieve this?
I have a process like this. I want to use transaction constraints on three write record nodes. Is there some easy way I can implement my require. another question is what the functional of sync records. I have read this document. https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/25.2/Sync_Records_Smart_Service.html But I don't understand the node's function and what scenario will use this node. I think when I use the write records, the data has already update into the database and sync automatically, why I need this node.
What is the approach if we want individual endpoints for each of the Users in Appian-->Admin-->Users
Hi all, I have one question regarding the way that Appian works with processes and how to notify parent interfaces. So in my case a I have a grid field on the parent page that has a list of open document processes and for each row I'll have a edit button like the following When clicking the edit button it loads another interface ( a dummy one for now) This is the new item button code for the way that I'm currently doing ( which is not working ) a!buttonArrayLayout( buttons: a!buttonWidget( label: "New item", icon: "plus", size: "SMALL", iconPosition: "START", saveInto: { a!save(local!selectedProcessId, null), a!save( local!currentNodeId, local!currentNodeId + 1 ), a!save(local!isEditMode, true()), a!startProcess( processModel: cons!ADBase_DummyProcessModel, processParameters: { Cancel: false(), ProcessData: null }, onSuccess: null(), onError: null() ) },
Hi In Interface under columns layout richTextFied was defined so that field was displaying to us and whatever the test user which i created newly same like user access for that also it was displaying that field but to the users it was not displaying there was no visibility conditions defined, when i replace that richtextField with paragraph field by passing same parameters then users were able to see that paragraph field so could you please confirm what exactly might be reason for this weird behavior a!columnLayout( contents: { richTextField( label:ri!resourceBundleDict.Signature, labelPosition: "ABOVE", richTextValue: local!maintenaceCDT.sign, richTextSaveInto : local!maintenaceCDT.sign, enableProgressBar :false() ), /*a!paragraphField(*/ /*label:ri!resourceBundleDict.Signature,*/ /*value:local!m
So the 5 text fields in the bottom of the page are actually link fields. This is a Landing page i was supposed to create which is still in progress. And the link fields lead to another site, but as you can see above they are very plain and unattractive to call them as a site. Is there any way that i can make these link fields more presentable and in a nice way so that this site can be called a WEBSITE. Thanks and Regards.
I am currently investigating process mining using ProcessHQ.I have added a process to do a ProcessInsight analysis within ProcessHQ, but an error occurs and I am unable to do the analysis.The error code is APNX-1-4579-027.A web search for the error code did not turn up any hits, and I am unable to proceed with my investigation into the cause of the problem.I would appreciate it if you could tell me the cause of the above error and how to correct it.
when trying to upload a template with 500 lines of data the readexcelsheet function was calling in interface to read those 500 lines in that only first 250 lines was fetching the function other 250 was not reading tried providing paging info too but still same only first 250 lines was reading Could you please confirm what could be the reason for this issue
Hi , I am working on requirement when creating a request for a user some plan will be available they can select any of the plan.Its ready only. It will be write to request plan table . Later in another task they will have option to select other plans belongs to them and they want to edit the plan name as well and they want to add new plans for the request alone and for the task related to it. Now this plan are populated from reference table we shouldn't alter that. So I tried to create the new plans from ref of type above mentioned request plan table. And I created a editable grid to populated the plan name to have option of edit . But I m struct saving the local data to rule input . This is my expression to create request plan from ref table local!gridDataforPlan: a!forEach( items: local!existingClientPlans, expression: if( contains( tointeger( index( local!vetRequestPlans, 'recordType! Request Plans.fields.planId',
Requirement is I will be entering emailaddresses on UI and it will be passed to the integration and the integration will return the emailAddresses with GUIDs . If any emailaddress is missing from the response which we entered then it must show that emailaddress on UI. Suppose I have passed test@test.com and test2@test.com and In repsonsed I get only GUID of only one emailaddress then it has to show the 2nd emailaddress on the UI as invalid error . How Can I achieve it
Hi Everyone,I'm running into an issue where one of my Appian process models stays in the "Active" state but doesn’t actually move forward past the first node. There are no errors in the logs, and all inputs look correct. It's just... stuck. I tried canceling and redeploying, even restarting the Appian engine, but the same thing happens again. This process used to work fine a week ago nothing significant has changed in the model. Could this be related to a timer event or a data store node silently failing? Thanks!
Currently, when users paste multiple lines of data into these fields, Appian merges everything into a single line. The requirement is to improve this behavior by allowing multi-line inputs to be preserved and formatted correctly—each line should be treated as a separate entry. Based on this input, the system should identify and display relevant matching data for each line, helping users quickly find and select multiple valid options. Example if we search - "Option 1", "Option 2", "Option 3" then relevant options should be displayed in the dropdown a!localVariables( local!selectedData, { a!columnsLayout( columns: { a!columnLayout( contents: { a!dropdownField( choiceLabels: {"Option 1", "Option 2", "Option 3", "Option 4", "Option 5", "Option 6", "Option 7", "Option 8", "Option 9", "Option 10", "Option 11", "Option 12"}, choiceValues: {1, 2,
So as shown in the above image iam using safelink() function for the buttons "Recruiter" and "Vendor" , etc... and i gave the web address of another site, but when i click on the button iam getting no response as if the button is just a dummy button, it is doing nothing. Have i made any errors in configuring the safelink function. Please someone guide me through it.
Hi all, I have a process model that calls an expression rule to generate a 6-character random alphanumeric string. I encountered a case where two instances of the process model were triggered at the same time (based on time logs), and both received the same generated value from the expression rule. I understand that there's always a chance for it to generate the same value. However, I’d like to ask: Is it possible that both process models used the same instance or execution thread of the expression rule, which might explain why the same value was returned?
I am having a wrapper interface and inside that first interface will have links listed in a grid ,on click of that dynamic link another interface open and has back button ,This wrapper is used as a record summary view.When I am testing from interface it is working fine but when I am testing from record View It is throwing an error.kindly help me to resolve? Grid Code:a!localVariables( { a!gridField( data: ri!relatedTransactionsInfo, columns: { a!gridColumn( label: "Transaction Id", value: a!richTextDisplayField( value: a!defaultValue( value: a!richTextItem( text: index(fv!row, "transaction_id", {}), link:a!dynamicLink( saveInto: { a!save(ri!currentTransactionId,ri!transactionId), a!save(ri!transactionId, index(fv!row, "transaction_id", {})), a!save(ri!showInterface,cons!NWS_TXT_NAVIGATION_TRANSACTION_VIEW) }, ), ), default: cons!NW_NULL_PLACEHOLDER_VALUE ) ), align: "START" ), a!gridColumn( label: "Type", value: a!richTextDispla
As shown in the above image i have a record table and from this record table i have to retrieve the fields recruiter and candidateID so i can send e-mails to them. This was my code for retrieving the data from the fields and then sending them automated emails. But, i am not getting any mails. Can anyone please help me about where i went wrong so i can rectify it.
Hi all, Is it possible to display an icon as a label in the header related action ? There is an option to select an icon but it's just a string, I couldn't use richTextIcon. The icon we can select below doesn't work either in that case. Thank you
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.