-
Recently active
Received requirement where needs to introduce 2 button named "TOP" and "BOTTOM" in the UI. On click of "TOP" button the focus of the UI should be moved to top of the UI and on click of "BOTTOM" button the focus of the UI should be moved to bottom of the UI. Is this achievable in Appian? If any suggestions please share.
Question : we have a employee table , we applied the partitions and indexes on the table to certain field. But the employee table is sync able record type , will the partition and indexes really gonna make any impact when i execute Query record on it ?
Hello, I have a record that includes a filter search functionality.
Error Evaluating UI Expression Expression evaluation error [evaluation ID = 6b656:9a842] in rule 'authorization_screen' : class java.lang.String cannot be cast to class com.appiancorp.core.data.Dictionary (java.lang.String is in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap'; com.appiancorp.core.data.Dictionary is in unnamed module of loader com.appiancorp.tomcat.loader.AppianWebappClassLoader @280e8a1a)
I´m starting the process for Debugging and it gets stucked in the Script Task, with the green box. I click refresh and it does not change anything, still the green box. Please let me know if I can do anything else to fix it. Thanks in advance!
Hi, BELOW Is SORT where we used a!save(local!a, index(sort(somevalue)),1,Null) Now after upgrading im getting error in interface invalid function {"SORT"} WHAT is the replacement of SORT NOW
Hi Team, I want to give access to all users to comment and view on case summary page in workspace, However want only managers/Admin to act(complete) on the cases(Tasks).Please help me to achieve this functionality. Thanks in advance
hi all, I have created announcement page where I have implemented delete button on the card when user click on that delete button that aprticular announcement deltes but page doesnt refreshes please help me achieve this a!localVariables( local!refreshVar: 0, local!bannerType, local!textValue1, local!textValue2, local!showInformationBanner: false, local!currentKeyword, local!selectedKeyword, local!announcementList:a!refreshVariable( value: rule!SLS_QRY_getAnnouncementDetails( title:local!selectedKeyword ), refreshOnVarChange: local!refreshVar, /*refreshAlways: true*/ ), local!announcementDetails: 'recordType!{71a7c745-7557-423b-b26e-5ea2b74ed0fa}SLS Announcement Sync'( 'recordType!{71a7c745-7557-423b-b26e-5ea2b74ed0fa}SLS Announcement Sync.fields.{616d2803-cf38-4c6b-93c1-81b0eeb76d52}announcementDate':now(), 'recordType!{71a7c745-7557-423b-b26e-5ea2b74ed0fa}SLS Announcement Sync.fields.{d18a41cf-dce9-4456-8339-0344b4668
I have an expression rule that returns a value based on rule inputs. When I run this rule as it own passing my test inputs, it gets the data I expect (an integer or 0). But when I run the rule in process model B, I get null as output even though my expression rule has no condition returning null. This is the expression rule with inputs and it's output Below is how I set up activity class of the script task inputs, I then saved it into a process variable pv!autoCaseTye in the outputs. However I only receive null as output instead of 50. The node that runs the rule has the exact same inputs and data type. It should return the same value as expression rule. How do I check the issue?
I am using Appian 24.3. I saw Appian has AI test case generation feature and I want to take a try, What I expected: What I actually got: Is there any setting I missed?
With CDT, we can use @Version annotation for optimistic locking. Optimistic locking is a concurrency control mechanism in which it ensures that concurrent transactions will not conflict with each other. If there is a chance of conflict during transactions, the transaction having an older version number will be aborted. Can we achieve a similar thing using Records?
I have a table with a legacy identifier and a current identifier. I want to query the table, by first check the current identifier for a match, then fall back to the legacy one. Is there a good way to do this with Appian queries? I cant really do what i want with or and and logical expressions.
i just have a general question about this statement in the documentation, "By default Appian runs with 3 shards each of the execution and analytics engines. The maximum number of shards for each of these engines is 32. Because they store unique data, once you have added a new shard for execution and analytics, you cannot remove that shard from your configuration." Does this mean one engine can have between 3 to 32 shards? 1 : 3 ... 1: 32. Thank you.
I have a User Input Task in a process model and I am getting this error message when I set the interface for the node. I can't find where this variable is in use. I do have a process variable for spkrEventDocuments and I set it to the process variable in the Data Inputs for the User Input Task There are no Outputs defined.
I have to learn how designing creating business processes any study material is there flowchart with configuration
Is it recommended to store all record types in a folder e.g. RecordType folder?
HI All, while case creation user will add policy number like this 12345675-7896 but when storing to DB will remove the "-" and will store only 123456757896 but while in the home page user filtering the record using 12345675-7896 the results will display null Could you please suggest me the better solution. Thanks in advance.
I have the below mentioned throwing the mismatch error. pls guide a!forEach( items: ri!Addresslist, expression: reduce( a!update, fv!item, merge( { "AddressId", "ReferenceId", "Type", "CreateBy", "CreateDate" }, { if( fv!item.AddressId = ri!primarykey, null, fv!item.AddressId ), ri!Dependent[fv!index].AppianUserId, "Permanent Home Address", loggedInUser(), a!defaultValue(fv!item.CreateDate, now()) } ) )) Expression evaluation error at function a!forEach: Error in a!forEach() expression during iteration 4: Expression evaluation error at function 'merge' parameter 2 [line 14]: Invalid index (4) for list: valid range is 1..3
I have an process model , getting ids and looping via batch vise. Im npt getting a error or data is not updating the same process model is showing in the Health Check Report that {<PROCESS MODEL NAME>tGet list of caseIds scheduled to process- (11 nodes in loop)}
I need help creating a process model to evaluate and batch update the status of a large group of users (30,000+ records) based on detailed criteria. The workflow logic is as follows, with any identifying info removed: User Status Evaluation Process Initial Conditions If either of the following conditions is true: There is an entry in a related table where the status is not equal to "denied", OR A specific approval flag is set to true. Then: No further action is needed for this record — it can be skipped. Handling Rejected Entries If an entry exists in the related table but its status is equal to "denied": Check if there is another flag indicating confirmation of a related process or action. No Entry and No Approval If no entry exists in the related table and the specific approval flag is false: First, check if a secondary task or decision exists with a status of "approved." If no approved secondary task or decision exists, check for th
Got 'Appian was not able to authenticate with the API Key provided' error when call an integration, but the api works fine in postman with same url and headers what could be the cause?
Hi Team, I created a Application and I want to add chatbot in that application. But I already have added the connected system and its working fine and when I ask anything so its giving the proper output but this error is also showing on interface Regards,
Hi everyone, I'm facing issue while saving unique identifier value into a local variable. By default indexes are getting saved but I want to save the identifier value so that even if custom filters are applied only the actual selected value is checked/selected in the grid. The working approach I came up till now is to convert my data into a datasubset using a!dataSubset and then use todatasubset with fv!pagingInfo from the grid. The issue which I found with this is todatasubset function is not able to over ride the paging configured by a!dataSubset, it could very well be an Appian issue not sure but due to this I'm getting full grid data in the screen. (Screenshot attached for this below) If you know any workaround for this or any approach you implemented for this use case please share!
Hi, I am evaluating Appian OOTB capabilities for Document extraction. We have Trained an AI skill, used it in a process model, reconciled it, etc. But what is not written or documented anywhere is how is Appian doing this behind the scenes. I am trying to understand if a client is using Appian Cloud, where does the Model run does it use the same infrastructure, if yes then how does this affect the memory/cpu power (Models are generally cpu hungry is what i understand). So by introducing an AI skill to an existing model how does it affect the runtime performance of the process model, the memory consumption. Do we need to consider any upgrades in the Appian engine before using AI Skills.
Hi everyone, I have this specific use case: I have to extract data from a pdf document using AI Skills. The pdf document has the structure of a table, with multiple rows. So the problem is, when setting up the AI Skill, when I want to label the fields, I can only select one of the rows. I want to extract the same field, say "email", for all the rows in my pdf table. Still haven't found a way to label repeating fields inside a document. Any workaround or help is much appreciated, thank you.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.