Foundation

How can we group rows in Readonly grid

Hi everyone. I have this view of records: When I click in the wraped link it opens the related summary record as follows: Do you know if is it possible to take out the wraped header or, at least, change the look of the buttons? And, moreover, as the buttons don´t fit in the header it shows and icon to see more actions. Thanks in advance.

So when I am trying to convert the DOCX file to PDF using the PDF from DOCX smart service. My document is not generating in the way I expect it to be. The same file if I convert online I can see the exact thing and the pdf version is same as docx but through appian I see change in font size and the words being misplaced. 

 I have the following requirement: In the backend table called conditions I have the columns called operator and value which have the values < and 18 I need to check the condition if the incoming is age is less than 18 then display true That is if( ri!age<18, true(), false()).  Here I need to get the values of the operator and value from the back end table,  I am using query record to get the condition table output.  How can I achieve this?

DOCX table: Generated PDF table: /resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/11/Screenshot-2025_2D00_12_2D00_04-at-10.42.15_2F20_AM.png Hi everyone, I’m using the PDF from DOCX plugin to generate a PDF from my DOCX template. The issue I’m facing is that the table formatting is not preserved in the generated PDF. In the DOCX file, long text (e.g., email addresses) wraps correctly inside the table cell and does not overflow. However, in the generated PDF, the same text overflows outside the table cell, even though the DOCX appears perfectly formatted. Has anyone encountered this issue before? Is there a workaround or specific table formatting that the plugin requires so the PDF output respects cell boundaries? Thanks in advance!

Good Afternoon, I am utilizing the pdf doc from template smart service to generate a pdf that is a snapshot document of a form that has been filled out by a user on the site.  The template I need to use in the smart service is an editable pdf template of the form that I then dynamically fill the inputs from the user into the template to generate the document.  The Problem:  The produced PDF document from the smart service is still an editable version while I need it to be a read only.  Does anyone have a solution for converting the generated new PDF from the smart service from editable to read only before I send it to off site storage?  Thank you

Dear all, we are facing an inspection error during the deployment process of the Case Management version 1.6 on Appian 24.3 as shown in the image below. We confused either the SYSTEM_GROUP_ROLE_STUDIO_EDITORS  group should be present with the package zip file or must presents on our current Appian installation as system group so if its a system group why it's not available in our current Appian 24.3

I want to collapse/Expand rows in read only grid by based on particular field and how can it will implemented

Receiving this error when I click on Clear Filters in the Monitoring Process Activity page: Appian version 25.4

I've created a process that utilizes the PDF Doc from Template Smart Service that was working correctly until this past weekend. There were no changes to the process model or to the template used to create our documents. I use to see a fully filled out pdf and now am seeing a blank page with empty boxes that display a value when clicked. Has anyone encountered this before?New behavior:[View:/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/14/20251124_2D00_2151_2D00_03.8000270.mp4:320:240] Previous behavior: [View:/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/14/20251124_2D00_2154_2D00_57.6194333.mp4:320:240]

Hi Team, Im trying a batch list of text items and prepare a query based on that. Below is my code snippet. With this code Im getting the last item of each list for the full batch of 50 items. local!getAgreementIds: if( rule!APN_isBlank( index( index(local!PartnersResult, "data", null), "agreement__cr.id", null ) ), index( local!AgreementResult.data, "agreement__cr.id", null ), index( local!PartnersResult.data, "agreement__cr.id", null ) ), local!agreementDocIds: touniformstring(rule!APN_distinct(local!getAgreementIds)), local!batchedDocIds: a!forEach( items: enumerate(ceiling(length(local!agreementDocIds) / 50)), expression: local!agreementDocIds[ (fv!item * 50) + 1 : min((fv!item + 1) * 50, length(local!agreementDocIds)) ] ),  For ex: I have a list of 59 items, when I try to batch I should get 50 items in 1 batch and remaining 9 items in another batch

Is it possible to generate a diagram showing all dependencies of objects?

Hi Team, have case details and applicant details record and updating few details and storing via  write record smart service  for multiple record type in the process model but have to get output primary key of 2 records and how to fetch it? thanks

Hi Team,  I have a requirement where I should not display test.admin user in suggestion This is my current condition which I have implemented to restrict a user, but it still displays the user in suggestion Users from Appian Directory, ri!user : User (Type) a!pickerFieldUsers( label: "Select User", maxSelections: 1, value: if(ri!user = "test.admin", {}, ri!user), saveInto: ri!user, required: true, ), Could someone please help us on this.

Hi all, I am using Appian 25.4 environment. I have tried Appian Composer by uploading a pdf with application requirements. While clicking on the generate objects process models and expression rules (business rules) are not getting created.      In the above picture, while hover over the caution nothing shows in the Interface. Can anyone help me with this issue.

Hi Everyone I have one subprocess process model which is having 10 nodes  which includes 2 xor gateways ,4 sync record smart service and 4 query database smart service. Complete process is activity chained in parent process we have one ui on click of button this subprocess will execute its should come back to same ui for that we have activity chained complete parent and child process. Now the issue is when we have 3 query database and  3 sync record smart service all works good .We got new requirement to sync one more record that time we have added one more sync smart service that time the process is not working as before.Later in subprocess which is have all sync smart service we just removed 2 xor gateways to decrease the nodes that time its worked properly.What would be the reason for that? Thanks in advance for the people who helps me to understand this .

In our Appian Site, we have a DummyHomePage interface that contains two sub-interfaces: DummyCustomFilter – used to select filter values DummyEditableGrid – displays the filtered data in a grid When a user selects filter values and clicks the action link in the grid, we navigate to the Record Summary View for the selected solutionId using a!recordLink() or urlForRecord().In the Summary View, we have a Back button that should return to the DummyHomePage while keeping the previously selected filter values.

We are using a!safelink to provide provision to download a file using presigned URL. The requirement is we need to store which user clicked on the link and when in audit table, but as in the safelink there are no saveinto parameter . I tried multiple other ways but all in vain. I am unable to find a solution, where on a single click user able to navigate using presigned url as well as in backed it writes to audit.  please advise what to do that in this case and any work around we can do to achieve the requirement. Thank you in advance

Hi All, We're getting an error like- "Expression evaluation error at function-  a!UserCardUiContents: The user does not exist." No object has been mentioned in the error mail to identify where the error is occurring.May I know please when this error generally occurs and how to resolve it. Thanks

I am getting some error while trying to save a process model, but I am not able to identify what I am doing wrong. Please find the screenshot of the Error as follows:Please note that I am able to save and publish this successfully, which is very strange. Here are the logs: 2025-11-20 08:50:35,302 [ajp-nio-0.0.0.0-8009-exec-20] ERROR com.appiancorp.process.design.presentation.ProcessDesignAccess - java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.appiancorp.suiteapi.process.ActivityClass.getParameters()" because the return value of "com.appiancorp.suiteapi.process.Escalation.getActivityClass()" is null java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.appiancorp.suiteapi.process.ActivityClass.getParameters()" because the return value of "com.appiancorp.suiteapi.process.Escalation.getActivityClass()" is null at com.appiancorp.process.design.presentation.ProcessDesignAccess.saveProcessModel(ProcessDesignAccess.java:1156) at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor11011.invoke(Unk

Hello All, We have a requirement to run the multiple process models as per schedule. The Scheduler will be responsible to identify which process to be triggered and when. For example we are maintaining below data in records-Processname - time - UUID Process Name Time UUID process 1 2:30:00PM, 5:30:00 PM uuid1 process 2 2:30:00PM, 5:35:00 PM uuid2 process 3 8:05:00 AM,2:30:00PM, 5:35:00 PM uuid3 process 4 10:05:00 AM,2:30:00PM uuid4 process 5 10:05:00 AM,2:35:00PM uuid5 process 6 12:05:00 PM,2:45:00PM uuid6 Now parent process is running and checking in each 5 mins and checking which process to be executed. Then it fetch the UUID of those processes and get the Process Model ID. This process model id will be used to call "Start Process" smart service with (MNI), each for identified process. I am using Start Process smart service because I am maintaining UUID in DB and need to get the processes dynamically. So here as per above example, at 2:30:PM I have 4 proc

Process model is newly added with Write Records of a new record type recently created and when comparing with previous version which doesnt have this record type in dev it is throwing attached error. Anyone faced this issue?

Hey!I'm going through the Appian docs for activity chaining https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/25.3/Sub-Process_Activity.html#activity-chaining-into-a-subprocess-activityI see that there is a checkbox to Enable activity-chaining into all initial nodes in the subprocess and Appian recommends(for the sake of design consistency) enabling activity chaining in the subprocess despite selecting this checkbox.  My question is with respect to the following statements as highlighted in image below1. I agree with the first statement and I have tried it out myself 2. The second statement says keep Enable activity-chaining into all initial nodes in the subprocess checkbox cleared if I have a start form in subprocess. Now, my question is - does it matter if I have checked/unchecked this checkbox as I already know the start form will be skipped. Like what am I achieving by clearing the checkbox if I know it's going to skip the start

I am getting some strange values from todate(). { todate("02/28/2025"), todate("02/29/2025"), todate("02/30/2025"), todate("02/31/2025"), todate("02/32/2025"), todate("06/31/2025"), todate("RR/28/B025") } It seems to try to auto-correct an invalid date to a valid date.  But it also seems to allow characters in the date which it evaluates somehow and comes up with wild dates as a result. First Question:  What's going on with todate() that it results in off-the-wall values? My scenarion is this.... I have a webApi that receives a json string which contains structured data that includes multiple date fields.  The webApi uses cast/fromjson to convert the json input string directly to a CDT that uses Date fields.  The CDT is passed to our expression rules that operate on the data. For example... CDT  (SH_Test) Expression rule (faking the WebApi) a!localVariables( local!inputString: "{ ""name"": ""Bob Smith"", ""birthDate"": ""GG/28/2025"",

Hi Team, we have notice below observations, please check and let me know if I missed anything, When we used  Sub-Process as asynchronous and running more than 1000 instances but those instances are not deleting even though  we have selected Allow more than 1000 instance check box....is there any limitations ?  when we used start process smart service  as asynchronous / synchronous way using MNI with 1000 instances then we have notice that even though we have selected Delete previously completed/cancelled instances. check BOX but those completed instances are not deleted in the monitoring dashboard....is there any limitations  ?. and in start process smart service we are unable to run the MNI more than 1000  instances ..if have run more than 1000 instance same like sub process asynchronously. How to achieve this scenario with using batch job ? thanks!