Discussion Categories

Hi Champs, Can I able to change the color of icon for an Appian record action. Regards, Ghanashyam

Hi, I have requirement like below. I have one main Record Type( MFU TestData), in that I will store some columns, And I have Second Record Type(MFU TestFiles), In that I will save files. and It is referencing above table.  Can someone please help me to upload multiple files and save them to folder and save the values to database. Please help me to write expression which stores data to main table and list of files to second table. I am getting the following error if select the column from reference table ri!record['recordType!MFU TestData.relationships.mfuTestfiles.fields.fileName']

Hi there! I'm facing this timeout issue - "The amount of time allocated for the completion of an unattended activity was insufficient to allow the activity to complete" in process model SFTP Smart Service. This issue occurs in the last instance of 20+ iterated instances and it resolves as soon as I retrigger the node. That last instance has only 4.87 KB JPG file to transfer. Anyone faced such kind of issue and how did you resolved?

Can anyone let me know if there is a way to update the group security using the Create Group smart service or any other method? Currently, my functionality requires me to create multiple groups with a single click. While this process successfully creates the groups, it automatically adds me as an admin to each group. I need to remove the creator’s name from the security settings. If you have any solutions or suggestions for this issue, please let me know.

It is a FormLayout with submit button, that works as a standalone: validation before the startprocess is fired. However, if I make it an interface called from a record view, it stops working: the process starts without the validation being done (basic "required" info).Here is the simplified code for the form: a!formLayout( contents: { a!columnsLayout( columns: { a!columnLayout( contents: { a!textField( label: "Numéro article", labelPosition: "ADJACENT", value: ri!record['recordType!{b3cc31cc-1595-401f-b13c-16b953dd1f5b}ED Projet.fields.{b0296e3d-29b7-42e8-acd8-a99e9fd26649}budgetPrevisionnel'], saveInto: ri!record['recordType!{b3cc31cc-1595-401f-b13c-16b953dd1f5b}ED Projet.fields.{b0296e3d-29b7-42e8-acd8-a99e9fd26649}budgetPrevisionnel'], required: true ), },

Hi Champs, I have a map value having multiple key and value pair. Now I want to check for a value which exists in one or more key. So I guess the only way to do that is to iterate over the keys in the map.  How can I achieve the same. As of my knowledge, for each works for no of map not for no of key/value pair in a map. Regards, Ghanashyam

Why I'm facing this issue when I try to create a robot? It was working, and I have deleted the robot to create a new one.

Hi all, I'm a beginner of Appian, and I am required to show data in a record type by using editable grid in an interface. May I know how to do it? If I use "read-only" grid, it is easy to show the data from record type, but I cannot do it by using an editable grid.. I've tried to look for a document in https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/24.2/Editable_Grid_Component.html#related-patterns, but I could not find it. I need your help! Thank you in advance, Yuki

Our user case is, We have an UI to manage the tasks where we have 2 dropdowns, Task Name and Precedent task name as shown below.Task Name -> Precedent Task NameTask A        -> ------Task B       -> Task ATask C       -> Task B Condition is,Task B can be dependent on Task A but Task A cannot be dependent on Task BTasks B & C can be dependent on Task A but Task A cannot be dependent on Task B or CTask B can be dependent on Task A and Task C can be dependent on Task B, but Task A cannot be dependent on Task C. Basically the requirement is to prevent creating circular logic among tasks. Since Task B is dependent on Task A, only if Task A is completed then Task B can be enabled. When user selects Task B or Task C as the precedent task for Task A, then a circular dependency will be created, hence to avoid this when user select B or C as Precedent task for Task A in UI, an error message should be shown. Today we have

 I would like to use a SAML Group claim, like <Appian Admin> so that when a user signs in, and they are in that IdP Group (from Azure Entra ID) that they are created as an admin console admin... Is there a way to use a "Common Object group" in Designer to manage admin console admins?

Some integrations (i.e. CRM Dynamics 365) have scopes tied to the environment. For some reason, this is the only parameter that we cannot put in an Import Customization file and it gets overwritten on each full deploy of the application.

Hello,I hope you can help me.I have a gried Field with a record Type as the data source (record A), which at the same time is based on a SQL table. Every row has a unique value of its primary key (request_id). Some of the columns of the grid are displaying values which are not from the main source record, but from another record with a one-to-many relationship.This second record (record B) is also based on a SQL table.  The relationship between them is through request_id. Because of this, I have included record B within the "relatedRecordData" parameter of the "a!gridField". I have stablished as well a limit of 1, and a descending sort field based on the date. This way, for every a_id, I only display the value of the latest row in record B (even if there are more rows with different values).This is working completely find. My problem comes when I try to add filters within "a!recordData" > "filters" . The moment I add a fil

I want to learn the most efficient way to create groups for markets,so that I don’t have to spend a lot of time recreating the same groups for 8 markets, want to implement group permissions for multiple markets at once.I know we have smart service to create groups and also we have plugin called Peoples functions plug-in. Do we have any other way ?

Hello, I looked at the updates version of the Pinecone connected system V3.0, the embedding model is hardcoded to text-embedding-ada-002. Is there a way to make this configurable, so we can pass other models?

Hello, I have the following validations on a file upload. When I upload a wrong extension for testing, it is giving me a completely different validation message than what I have in my code and I'm not sure where it's getting it from. Also, it looks like each time I upload a new file, the earlier validation message does not get replaced with the new one and I have no point of reference to see where this is happening, if anyone knows how to fix these two issues I'd really appreciate it. Here is the code. For reference, the constant being used (cons!GF_FILE_EXTENSIONS_UTILITY_PACKAGE_ARTIFACTS) has an array of all valid extensions (pdf, jpg, png, etc.)

We recently pushed deployed an interface from our development environment into our preproduction environment. A part of this interface is a document upload that then uses an imageField component to render the an uploaded heat map image. The component and interface worked as expected in development but in preproduction the image fails to render. We have checked things like security even though we noticed while logged in as admins. We tested using a small-scale interface and experienced the same behavior. I'm not sure what could be the discrepancy at this point. I'll upload some screenshots for clarity.

I am having issue running FitNesse with Edge browser. Google Chrome and Firefox does not have any issue. I would appreciate if someone could shed some light on this. Thanks.

Hello, I have tried to execute fitnesse script in EDGE browser. However, am getting below error. Kindly help to resolve this issue.Note: The same script was working fine in CHROME browser. Thanks in advance. 

I am looking to use SAML 'Attribute Mapping' configuration to 'create new users upon sign in'. Is there a way I could create a user as a system administrator based on SAML attribute mapping?

our current appian primary database is on oracle which we are migrating to PostgreSQL we are using GCP DMS for migration from oracle to PostgreSQL after migration we found few column which is as  BLOB in oracle is migrated as bytea in postgresql no when we are starting tomcat we are getting error  org.hibernate.tool.schema.spi.SchemaManagementException: Schema-validation: wrong column type encountered in column [edit_events] in table [app_edit_history]; found [bytea (Types#BINARY)], but expecting [oid (Types#BLOB)] is any one faced this issue please help with resolution

I have a table with a field "name" which is of text type. It follows a fixed pattern and all the entries are very similar. The entries contain text and numerical values, e.g. Practice 1, Practice 2, Practice 3, ..., Practice n where n can be any number. I need to sort it in the ascending order of the numerical suffix. If I sort it as text only I get something like Practice 1, Practice 10, Practice 2, ..., Practice 9 assuming there are only 10 Practices. However, it has to be sorted as Practice 1, ..., Practice 9, Practice 10 as per my requirement. How can I achieve this?I have attached a picture of my code in the query editor below. I tried casting name to integer using the tointeger() function like below but it gave me an error saying we can't cast on a field.sort: { a!sortInfo( field: tointeger(record.name), ascending: true ) }

Hello,  When a process is started from a timer and no user is assigned to it, what user will have started that process?For example, when viewing process instances, who will be the user in the Started By column? Thank you,  Nick

Hi All, We are getting the following error as startindex cannot be greater than totalCount. Start index was 31 and totalcount was 0. We are using process report query for querying the data and for paginginfo, we are using fv!paginginfo. We are getting the above error only in prod and we are being notified via the error mail as part of the new appian release. No user has reported this issue. We are not able to understand why this error is occuring. One observation was when errors are triggered, startindex is having 11, 21,31,51 etc. Any suggestions will be helpful

Hi Alla!localVariables( local!crFeesComments_cdt: rule!CR_FN_getModuleComments( crModuleComments: ri!crModuleComments_cdt, commentId_int: cons!CR_AS_COMMENT_IDS[1] ), local!crPricingApprovalComments_cdt: rule!CR_FN_getModuleComments( crModuleComments: ri!crModuleComments_cdt, commentId_int: cons!CR_AS_COMMENT_IDS[2] ), local!crFxRatesBuy_cdt: index( ri!crFxRatesFromDb_cdt, wherecontains( { 1, 2, 3 }, index( ri!crFxRatesFromDb_cdt, "seqNumber_int", {} ) ), {} ), local!crFxRatesSell_cdt: index( ri!crFxRatesFromDb_cdt, wherecontains( { 4, 5, 6 }, index( ri!crFxRatesFromDb_cdt, "seqNumber_int", {} ) ), {} ), { rule!CR_RT_displayInformativeNote( pageName_txt: cons!CR_TXT_SECTION_NAMES_TODISPLAY_AMOUNT[3] ), rule!CR_SC_AS_displayROCOverview( cif_int: ri!cif_int, systemRequestId_int: ri!systemRequestId_int, cr

Hello community, There is a scenerio where I just want to add a user filter to popup only with the options that are mapped to a record. e.g. there are 10 reference records used in filter and mapping is like:: Record A - 1,2,3,4 Record B - 4,5,6 Record C - 6,8,,4,3,9 Is there any way to just popup mapped referenced values to the filters for selected records.