User Experience Design

Hi team,There is one requirement where I have one record for which I have one summary view. In the summary view, I am maintaining 3 tabs: Request Details, Country List, and Audit History. Here, I am maintaining a site with 2 tabs. In Tab 1, I want to show a grid, and upon clicking on the Request ID, it will open the summary page. In this tab, I want to show the Audit History section. However, if I click on a request in the grid in Tab 2, I want to show only the Request Details and Country List. Is this possible in Appian?

Hi All,  I m a beginner in appian. As part of my request, I need to build a editable grid with record data rule input. I have 5 fields totally and I need to display them. Can someone help me how to configure edit button and add button and what actions I need to perform to save or update the values to the rule input. And i should add only one row at a time and all the fields in grid are mandatory. Can someone help me with the code. 

Hi all, there is one requirement where user will search with 2 to 3 part number like 3456,3234. We should show in which countries this part numbers are allowed to use data base structure :  countrylistid(pk) , partnumber, countryname, isallowed(bit(1)). Notes : For 1 one part number there are 150 entries in database.

Hi, I have a gridfield inside a foreach loop. I need to display the items side by side. Currently it is displayed one below the other. I need to display 2 grids in each row.  How to achieve this.

Hi, I have a local variable with multiple values. I used foreach loop to iterate a grid. I got multiple grids based on the number of values in the local variable. I have another variable containing users. The user name should be displayed at the top of each grid. Example if there are 4 grids I need to display 4 names . Each name above each grid. I want to know how to merge these two values to display each user names at the top of each grid. local!user:ri!selectedLeaderIds (contains Users)

I am creating editable tree grid. I want to save the identifier value in local!selection. GridLayout and GridRowLayout are in two different rules.GridLayout in an interface and GridRowLayout is in a expression rule. the selection saves values in local when the selection style is "ROW_HIGHLIGHT" but not "CHECKBOX" Can anyone help me resolve this issue?

We are experiencing an unusual issue in our application running on Appian version 24.4. When users fill out a text field and tab out, the value is not immediately saved to the associated local variables or rule inputs. Interestingly, the value only seems to persist after entering text two or three times. This behavior is inconsistent and unexpected. Has anyone else encountered this issue or identified a possible root cause? Any suggestions or workarounds would be greatly appreciated.

I am in a site and I need to open an interface/site in a new Tab, and I need to pass more than 500 items in a List of Text format to the new Tab site

 I have created a form and now I want  likenow how will the input details of this form will go when we click on save  button and also how access CDT and DS and how will data get saved [mention:a11f77a729fb4db2af76b09948583328:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] [mention:2df2892a4df7486f9775b4d2f0e405fd:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05]  [mention:ba9672c2f5294cb98c0a2b8fb79cf967:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05]  [mention:b45a4f6a20b14a008e4e0ec732a8bf98:e9ed411860ed4f2ba0265705b8793d05] 

Hi! In the Appian Designer, we have interfaces with text fields that save into rule inputs or local variables. When entering in data into each of these text fields, the data is only sometimes saved in the rule inputs or the local variables. Why is the user input not saving all of the time? Has anyone encountered this issue before? Below is an example with four text fields. Text1 and Text2 save into rule inputs ri!text1 and ri!text2 both of type text. Text3 and Text4 save into local!text3 and local!text4. User input is not saved every time the value changes. a!localVariables( local!text3, local!text4, { a!textField( label: "Text1", labelPosition: "ABOVE", value: ri!text1, saveInto: {ri!text1}, refreshAfter: "UNFOCUS", validations: {} ), a!textField( label: "Text2", labelPosition: "ABOVE", value: ri!text2, saveInto: {ri!text2}, refreshAfter: "UNFOCUS", validations: {} ), a!textField( label: "Text3", labelPosition: "A

hi team, we are trying to run 2 smart services in signle saveinto but one smart service is running in the backend but 2 nd smart service not working, is that validation in appian?or did i missed anything, could you please suggest me? thanks

Hello people! I have a problem with the dropdown component. My component is initially initialized with the value of a null variable, but when I change it to a valid value according to the range, it works normally, but when I click on the selection option (placeholder), I get the following error Could not display interface. Please check definition and inputs. Interface Definition: Expression evaluation error in rule 'interface' at function a!dropdownField [line 1098]: A dropdown component [label="Estado"] has an invalid value for "value". All selected values must be present in the choiceValues array, but value was and choiceValues was AC; AL; AM; AP; BA; CE; DF; ES; GO; MA; MG; MS; MT; PA; PB; PE; PI; PR; RJ; RN; RO; RR; RS; SC; SE; SP; TO. The variable has a null value and the component is understanding it as an invalid value. Can anyone help me?

a!richTextDisplayField( value: a!richTextItem( text: "Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum." ) )] Example:  My Test should be this way, no matter the words amount __ ___ ______ __ ___ ___, __ _____ ___ ____ ______ __ ___ ______ __ ___ ___, __ _____ ___ ____ ______ So, how would I be able to justify a text? Because I haven't seen such option.  

We have created an interface using a!headerContentLayout() with isHeaderFixed: if(a!isPageWidth("PHONE"),false,true) and it works great if you are simply on the page.  But if you use it in a Record Action with a Dialog box the Fixed Header does not work. Is there a way to fix this?

Hi Am trying an interface where I expect to call the record action on click of the card layout. I took the inspiration from the inspiration page mentioned below, however not able to call the record action. Is it possible? https://docs.appian.com/suite/help/25.1/sail/ins-agent-home-page.html

Hello Community, We are building an enterprise-grade BPM platform using Appian to manage various distributed banking processes such as loan applications, KYC, onboarding, and more. One of our architectural goals is to ensure flexibility and scalability, especially when dealing with multiple business domains and product types (e.g., Car Loan, House Loan, Personal Finance). In our design, we have a universal process registry (PROCESS_MASTER) that links to all BPM activities. However, each product and process can introduce different sets of business-specific fields. We want to allow for product/process-specific data entry without creating a separate CDT or database table per product. Proposed Approach: Store shared/common fields in a structured APPLICATION_DATA table. Store product-specific or process-specific fields using a DYNAMIC_ATTRIBUTES table (key-value structure) linked by master key. Use Appian expressions and record interfaces to dynamically render fields based on metadata. Use

Hey all! I'm sharing the Appian interface I recently built to give better visibility into the system's recent internal Login Audit files (instead of constantly downloading and opening CSV files) - particularly helpful if you're an O&M user and/or diagnosing login issues for any other reason. This interface relies on the Log Reader plug-in (and also uses the Date and Time Utilites plug-in for a certain transform on timestamps).  That said, I can't say how it'll perform on multi-server environments, since I don't have one to try it on. The entire interface is self-contained, with the sole exception of a custom rule I wrote that utilizes the internal "User" record to take an entered username and get the system's properly-cased username (since there is some inconsistent case sensitivity around usernames and there's no other way I could come up with to tell what the 'real' version is).  I'll include that expression rule co

Good morning, I need to add an editable column in a gridField because I don't want to lose functionality. Is it possible to do this?

hi team, how to add the multiple documents at the same time to record  could you please suggest me. thanks

Is is possible to create an interface where there is a carousel list for images, cards, etc. ? Refer to the image above.

 t= a!localVariables( local!data: ri!_Requests, local!errorMessage: "test", local!result, local!emails: ri!_Requests.emailAddresses, local!integration, local!individualMail: if( a!isNullOrEmpty(local!emails), {}, reject( fn!isnull(_), split(local!emails, char(10)) ) ), local!invalidEmails: substitute( tostring( reject( fn!isnull(_), a!forEach( items: local!individualMail, expression: if( regexmatch( pattern: "^s[A-Z0-9\_-]+(\.{0,1}[A-Z0-9\+_-]+)*[@]{1}[A-Z0-9.-]*[A-Z0-9-]+[.]{1}[A-Z]{2,6}$", searchString: fv!item, regexFlags: "si" ), null, fv!index ) ) ) ), ";", "," ), local!validation: if( isnull(local!invalidEmails), {}, "Emails must be in a valid format, and each email must be on a new line. " ), a!formLayout( label: "Request", contents:

Hi Community, I'm working on an Appian interface for updating a parent table(BaseOilOrConcentrate) which includes a related editable grid of child table(WIW_OIL_SPEC_CONTROLES). I use a rule-backed component (rule!WIW_gridLayout_specs_Oil) to display and manage this grid. When I delete a row from the grid (child spec), it gets removed from the database immediately (which is expected). However, after clicking the Submit button to finalize the update, the deleted child records reappear in the database. Has anyone encountered a similar situation? Is there a recommended approach to persist deletion state across the interface and process model without modifying the rule? Thanks in advance for any suggestions!

In the performance matrix for an interface is: blue is caused by local!A.pink is caused by local!B. But local!B is using results from local!A . Since the logic is already evaluated in local!A, local!B is simply calling the results from local!A, then why it's taking the same amount of time.

Can we perform 2 operations within the same expression of a forEach loop possible? (Ex: zip in python.)

I was hoping for advice regarding a Custom picker field I recently setup. It works similar to a dropdown but with text search, so as you start searching.. the dropdown starts filtering based off what was typed. The issue I am having is a small issue I found where if I type AB. (dot) the first codes listed in the dropdown are "TAB." and "AB." comes after it. Screenshot below: Do you know of a way within a custom picker field like this that I can sort it so that if I type "AB." codes that start with "AB." will be listed first before TAB? Here is some of the underlying code in case that would help you understand if this is possible or not.. This is the custom picker field: a!pickerFieldCustom( label: "Strategy Code", placeholder: "--Please type in--", value: if( a!isNullOrEmpty(ri!strategyCodes), {}, ri!strategyCodes )