Foundation

a!localVariables( local!data:rule!VG_CRK_RT_get_all_srvc_nm(), local!exportDocId, local!errorMessage, local!flag:false(), a!formLayout( label: "", contents: { a!sectionLayout( label: "", contents: { a!radioButtonField( label: "Select Any Option", labelPosition: "ABOVE", instructions: "", helpTooltip: "Before Uploading, Download a file for service, to view latest data", choiceLabels: {"Download", "Upload"}, choiceValues: {false(),true()}, value: ri!isUpload, saveInto: {ri!isUpload}, required: true, choiceLayout: "STACKED", validations: {} ) } ), a!richTextDisplayField( labelPosition: "COLLAPSED", value: { "Before Uploading, Download a file for service, to view latest data" } ), a!dropdownField( label: "Service Name",

how to validate a text field which can be  A,B,C,D, Null, or groups of A,B,C,D (ex. ‘A,B,C’ with commas no space).

I have table by name abc which have columns id(pk),refId(FK),uniqueId,languageId,locationhere language Id is : id for languages ex: english =1 , french=2, hindi=3 etc unique id is: if say for refId(fk) there are 5 location then unique id is 1,2,3,4,5 for language id 1, unique id is 1,2,3,4,5 for language id 2, unique id is 1,2,3,4,5 for language id 3 etc so here my requirement is based on selection of ref Id I want to add location using grid but here challenge is user can allow to add location in all available languages and need to maintain uniqueid's same.one thing need to consider is unique Id should be the next number to existing unique id for that particular refId.Please do help, am struggling to implement it.                                                                        &

In a gridField() fed by record data, when you try to use the disableRowSelectionWhen param, record references fail to be evaluated. As an example, we were trying to disable row selection based on a date time in the record data. Originally we had it wrapped in a todate() so we could compare it to a date, but the logic was failing to disable the desired rows. Just for fun we removed the todate() around the record field reference, only to be smacked with an error about not being able to compare Null to a date. That's right, the record reference evaluated to Null. For more fun, we tried using fields that were not dates, and the same thing happened on integer fields, i.e. the record reference evaluated to Null. Has anyone else run into this? 

HI All,  I have SAIL form with summary details and  a grid.  i have a add card layout button above the grid which will open different process to add data. when Calling Process model using a!StartPRocessLink service under add button(card layout) from Parent Sail form which mostly read-only info. when i click on Add button , i receiving a message saying you would like to leave from this page., looks like its browser message.  navigate to chained forms/process model and once added data its expected to come back to same form. Please suggest how can i avoid such message, Thanks in advance.

how to redirect to site record page by using record link. a!linkField( links: a!recordLink( label: fv!row['recordType!{3a9fe53d-c80b-44ca-9818-c29c6bd853a5}TRM Request Type.fields.{986b4d5b-200e-4665-a365-33808cab1533}name'], recordType: 'recordType!{3a9fe53d-c80b-44ca-9818-c29c6bd853a5}TRM Request Type', identifier: fv!identifier, dashboard: "summary", openLinkIn: "NEW_TAB" ) )

only document id shown  is there any changes in Interface ?

How do i start a process from Email by assigning Receive message event by sending a mail to my process model UUID the process should start!

Hi Guys, Please lemme know .., what are the roles & limitations of activity chaining ? in which kind of scenarios we use activity chaining? in which kind of scenarios chaining may break generally?

An e-mail could not be sent because the run as user for this activity could not access one or more of the groups listed in the e-mail address.

in a process i have two  user input tasks let first is x and second is y now i have scenario 1) where the user 1 completed X then he only need to complete Y or where the user 2 completed X then he only need to complete Y 2)when the user 1 complete X then we have to restrict to complete Y by  the user 1 or  when the user 2 complete X then we have to restrict to complete Y by  the user 2

a!localVariables(local!x:{{name:"rajini",marks:25},{name:"vamshi",marks:30},{name:"rajini",marks:40},{name:"venkatesh",marks:88}},/*using index,wherecontains() need to fetch only rajini details*/)

Is there a way to filter a grid on the rows that you selected or have not selected. Use case being if your grid is really large and data are on multiple pages. When you go through pages selecting items, maybe you want to filter by selected items to see all the items you've selected? Is there a way to make a selected filter? Not sure if this can be a user filter.

Hi everyone, I'm quite stuck at this part so I'm needing some helps [emoticon:6d505171faa4497c85c5ca27290c555d] I built an interface to show a report which data is from a view, the view looks like this table below:  Case Id Step  User doing this step Updated Date Time 1 Created Molly 11/11/2021 5:11 2 Processing John 11/9/2021 7:22 2 Pending John 11/3/2022 8:33 2 Completed Molly 11/2/2022 9:11 3 Created Nick 10/5/2022 13:20 4 Processing Nick 9/9/2022 9:09 4 Pending Molly 12/8/2021 6:12 4 Completed Molly 12/6/2021 6:12 4 Created Molly 22/10/2022  1:20 The interface does not show updatedDateTime + Step (business requirement), and was filtered by loginUser(), which is why I got this result of duplicating rows with same case ID and other columns all have the same values in the report for the same case. Is there anyway I can get the unique row using Appian if there are duplicating row in the interface?  Case Id Created date Related

Hello all, Is there a function or process within Appian to store and specific value for every user? (Similar to session variables in.Net,) the use case is: We have a dropdown with general values in our main page, so depend on the value selected all the subsequent pages needs to take care of that value. We want to store that value selected for every user in his own session. I did some research to use constant, but for this we need to create constant in sail code (in appian it's no possible, only update), it's not a good approach. Another thing that we discuss was to pass the value as a rule input in every object (interfaces, query rules, Process Models, etc) not sure if its a good approach since the user can go directly to other pages (saved as bookmark) even if no value is selected, but it's a must for our app. Another approach that we are thinking it's storing the value in a "customfield 1" but the function doesn't work "a!updateUserProfile()".

Hi.  On write to datastore for overwriting an EXISTING record I am getting the following error.  ids for this class must be manually assigned before calling save(): I see plenty of posts saying enable autogeneration, but don't feel this is appropriate given no autogeneration should be occurring on this entry and it already has a primary key filled in. If such a thing did work after enabling autogeneration, it seems to me that would mean something is going wrong and a completely new Entity is being saved. Am I wrong in this understanding?

Hi All,          I couldn't see generated emails in our DEV environment as this is blocked by our admin. Surprisingly , I can test emails only in Preprod environment.  Is there anyway by which I can check the generated HTML like saving it  into to a process variable in custom output like the screenshot below.  FYI , I am using html templates in the email. Any help or comments will be highly appreciated Thanks in Advance, MikeMiracle  

Hello everyone, Trying to add back button on the summary page and then returning back to the same list, but not getting any perfect solution for this. "I need back button on summary page and when a user clicks on it, it will get back to the same list."  Thanks for any help.

Hi, here from line 515 if condition is executing but it's showing only highlighted one not the remaining conditions. it has to show the remaining list of data but not showing what might be the reason for that 

Hello everyone,  I need that when a user offline submits a user input task, it does not disappear from the task list and he can see it in the future. Is it possible in appian configurate process/task in such way? Thanks for any help.

My Appian Community Edition site seems to have disappeared. Instead of the usual link to my instance, there's a "get my site" button. Did something happen to the servers?

Any example to hit process model through dropdown value in Interface

Is it possible to capture the page level action?    Eg : When submit button is clicked - We get - "Action Completed" Message or Eg: When submit button is clicked - "Field 1 is a required field" How do we capture the messages?