Governance

Hi All, Has anybody integrated with GraphQL End point which retuns a JSON formatted response. i

Hi All, Can anyone please help, on how we can disable the login.jsp page, so that, when users tries to access it, there will be an error throwed. Warm Regards Vineeth

Has anyone seen this message before? Filters are working in lower environments but not in prod. This message is displayed for all record types regardless of number of data.

Hi All, Second error: Appian environment went down and became very slow. From Appian admin we received the tomcat.std logs: 2022-11-22 03:00:07,489 [RecordSyncScheduler_Worker-1] ERROR com.appiancorp.core.expr.portable.storage.StorageDoubleTimestamp - Incorrect type (java.sql.Date) for DateTime variable (2022-06-08). Expected Type: java.sql.Timestamp. Auto-correcting to "2022-06-08 00:00:00.0" 2022-11-22 03:00:07,489 [RecordSyncScheduler_Worker-1] ERROR com.appiancorp.core.expr.portable.storage.StorageDoubleTimestamp - Incorrect type (java.sql.Date) for DateTime variable (2022-06-15). Expected Type: java.sql.Timestamp. Auto-correcting to "2022-06-15 00:00:00.0" 2022-11-22 03:00:11,412 [RecordSyncScheduler_Worker-1] INFO com.appiancorp.record.service.quartz.LoggingTriggerListener - Trigger [group: record_load_group, name: 2] completed for job [group: record_load_group, name: 2] 2022-11-22 04:00:00,708 [RecordSyncScheduler_Worker-2] INFO com.appiancorp.record.service.quartz.LoggingTrig

Hello,  Does anyone know if it is possible to make a related action visible or not depending on the user?.Because I want only the user who performed the action to be able to edit it again, this is my table Thank you very much

Hi, please archive? thank you!

Does Appian SAML SSO work with http (not https) IDP requests. Is it mandatory to have all the systems running under https rather than http to be compatible with saml SSO? What is the rule?

Hi,  For the creation of Users in Appian, what the different validations for it. Please help me with it. E.g max char for the firstName and lastName Thanks

Hi, We are currently runnning on Appian 23.1 with Linux OnPrem servers. We are using Apache Webservers. Can we replace Apache web server with Citrix NetScaler Load Balancer. Is any one using this setup. We have two sets of environments (one with high availability for certain applications) and the other is Distributed( for other applications). Kindly advise on the use of load balancer and provide any documentation on the same. Regards, Chetana

Hey everyone, I've been going through the Appian Documentation for the "Send E-Mail Smart Service", and I have a question about adding recipients in the "To:" field. The documentation suggests various methods for adding users or groups, such as typing their names, selecting them from a list, or directly inputting email addresses with semicolon separation (;). One concern I have is the design flaw when manually entering individual users, without using a group. Is there a way to find them later through some interface that allows me to find these users? My goal is to detect whether any of the manually entered individual recipients (e.g., the logged-in user, or any user that we will enter) appear in the "To:" field by searching through ALL the Process Models at once. Additionally, I'm uncertain if there is a way to search through all the Process Models (maybe by using: Process Modeller -> Tools -> Generate Documentation). If you have any insights

Hello I have this setup: - Inner interface that allows to view or edit a record, but it has no buttons - There are outer interfaces that include the inner one, adding to it action buttons or extra fields - The inner interface calculates a field (e.g. cost=number of parts * cost of each part). The result of this calculation is shown to the user in the inner interface, but it also should be stored in a field of the record type. The problem I have is that the inner interface cannot save the calculated cost to the record rule input, because it has no buttons and therefore it can't use a single a!save. The calculated field is shown to the user in a readonly or disabled textField, but its saveInto is innefective when its value changes after the calculation. saveInto works only when the field is enabled and the user types into it. The outer interfaces can update the record type using a!save in its buttons, but they must repeat the call to the calcu

Is there a limit on the number of packages which an environment can contain?

Hi folks, I want to know if Appian has got an anonymous reporting features(whistelblowing) by the user of an application/site, like this one in the link: Compliance & Government Affairs Hotline Solutions - Life Sciences | Appian. I don't find anything unfortunately, not in the documentation neither in the support section. Does anybody has some idea? Thanks in advance

I'm using the connected onboarding solution for a demo and there are a bunch of really old tasks showing up in the My Tasks and Group Tasks view.  I thought if I cancelled the onboarding, it would clear out related tasks, but it didn't.  Now i'm stuck with a bunch of orphan tasks in the user interface which makes for a pretty messy demo.  How can I safely get rid of old tasks from the UI?

In the Appian Designer, we can see the NEW tab which shows all the design objects like process model, record type, Data type, interface, etc.  Can we customize that view i.e. can we restrict the limited objects to a specific group of users? Please let me know that will be most helpful.

Hi, I am trying to upgrade from 22.1 to 23.2 in my local machine. while starting the services, all engines are running in Primary mode except exec02 engine.I am getting below error in db_PX021_2023-09-07_1335.log 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Default) INFO .u "Hashing count of 10432 UUIDs into short hash for table U" 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Base) INFO .migrate " 0% Migrating from version: migrate_null_process_history_221" 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Base) INFO .migrate " 10% Updating version tag to: reset_analytics_timer_type_221" 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Base) INFO .migrate " 20% Updating version tag to: reset_analytics_timer_type_222" 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Base) INFO .migrate " 30% Updating version tag to: reset_analytics_timer_type_223" 2023-09-21 00:28:17 [PX021] {pe5566.kdb ,97481397} (Base) INFO .migrate " 40% Done: migrate_process_model_history

a!sideBySideItem( item: a!pickerFieldCustom( labelPosition: "COLLAPSED", placeholder: "Department", suggestFunction: rule!INO_departmentSearchSuggestFunction( nameList: if( rule!INO_isBlank(ri!selectedDepartmentList), ri!departmentList.departmentDescription, index( remove( ri!departmentList, wherecontains( ri!selectedDepartmentList, ri!departmentList ) ), "departmentDescription", null ) ), departmentList: if( rule!INO_isBlank(ri!selectedDepartmentList), ri!departmentList, remove( ri!departmentList, wherecontains( ri!selectedDepartmentList, ri

We have 3 cloud based environments: DEV, QC & Production. When the Appian platform is being upgraded on the cloud, we can schedule the date/time it happens for each environment. General good practice is that you should upgrade your non-production environments first. After a period of regression testing on those environments, you upgrade your production environment. Now, if we upgrade our non-development environments first for a period of a week to give the developers and software testers time to do their regression testing, we cannot deploy any new features or bug fixes to production during this time as the Appian versions on DEV/QC are different to Production. This is a major problem if during that week of testing a critical bug is found in production that needs to be fixed and deployed to production ASAP. How do you all handle this?

Hi all,  i have this problem with the calendar: today is shown as saturday, but it's friday.  I don't understand how to change this setting, and i don't think it's depending by the timezone. Anyway, there isn't the UTC+2 for italy timezone.  Anyone have some idea?  Thanks in advance

In case of record sync failure, I want specific people to be informed instead of all system admins.

Hi, we need to configure VPN Tunnel for a new Cloud Environment. Client ask us if IKE use Aggresive Mode. We check, but we didn't find any information in documentation about it Could you help us? Thanks

Hello, I'm working with a dynamik k¡link element who adds a row to a table and I was wondering why this text shows and if it possible to get rid of it: "A new grid row will be added to the grid behind you" Thanks!

Hello everyone, We are currently facing challenges when it comes to identifying users who are part of Constants of Type "User" or "User or Group". This poses a problem when we need to deactivate someone's account and remove or replace them from all associated groups and constants. We have successfully obtained the list of group names that a user (e.g., the logged-in user) belongs to using the following code snippet: a!richTextDisplayField( value: { a!richTextBulletedList( items: { a!forEach( items: getgroupsformemberuser(loggedInUser()), expression: group(fv!item, "groupName") ) } ) } ) However, we still encounter difficulties in identifying users who are part of Constants of Type "User" or "User or Group". We are considering the use of constant descriptions to improve the search process for these constants. If you have any