-
Recently active
Hi, I have a user input task assigned to Approvers group (which has Manager access). The process model security also has Approvers(group) - Manager access. I want to control the reassignment by users of this group to do within the group of Approvers but not from all users and groups. I tried the below setting, but still I see "All users and groups" option shown.
I went through the previous threads, and from a discussion 11 months ago, it was mentioned that Appian doesn't support dark mode. Are there any updates or changes on this now? I noticed that Appian does have a dark mode for sites ("Site Color Schemes - Appian 23.1"). The challenge arises in our application (and likely most applications), as we have multiple interfaces. I’ve seen many people refer to using browser extensions for this. So, my question is: What’s the best way to incorporate Appian's dark mode into industry-level applications in 2025? If its Browser Extension, what is the safest Browser Extension?
In the a!eventHistoryListField, I want to display the date and time in this format: 01/Feb/2025 19:25 GMT+00:00. How can I change the format of the timestamp parameter? It supports date-time, date, and date-time-zone format values, so I can't use the cast text function.
Hello everyoneI am facing the following issue: Could not display interface. Please check definition and inputs. Interface Definition: Expression evaluation error at function a!gridField [line 3]: No enum constant com.appiancorp.core.expr.portable.cdt.LogicalOperator.<> And after some triage, I am not able to find the route cause for this issue. Can you give me some tips? Thanks in advance Edit: a!localVariables( local!paging, a!gridField( label: "Envelope List", labelPosition: "COLLAPSED", emptyGridMessage: "No Envelopes", data: rule!VCP_qr_getEnvelopeLookupView(filters: ri!filters), columns: { a!gridColumn( label: "Envelope Name", value: if( ri!isReportMode, a!linkField( links: a!recordLink( label: fv!row['recordType!{b010e97a-6864-4483-a8a3-f88e04282917}VCP Envelope.fields.{905ee3c6-5418-44bb-b35d-29317c1ed879}name'], recordType: 'recordType!{b010e97a-6864-4483-a8a3-f88e04282917}VCP Envelope', identifier: fv!row['recordType!{b010e97a-6864-4483-a8a3-f88e0428291
I have a scenario where, if I click the "Reject" button, the comments field should be required and cannot be empty. If the "Approve" button is clicked, the comments field should be optional and be submitted. I have a ri!cancel input that changes to true when "Reject" is clicked and false when "Approve" is clicked. However, the validation isn't working as expected. I tried setting the "required" parameter to ri!cancel, but after clicking "Reject" and then "Approve," ri!cancel doesn't seem to change back to false, and still throws validation for approve button if comments is emptyCode for the interface comment field and buttons: a!textField( label: "Comments", labelPosition: if(ri!readOnly, "ADJACENT", "ABOVE"), value: ri!TR_Expense_Details.comments, saveInto: ri!TR_Expense_Details.comments, characterLimit: 250, showWhen: ri!TR_Expense_Details.hrApproval = true(),
Hi Experts, Need your help in one scenario. I have one interface which is fetching a data in a local variable from an ER in which we are getting response from an API. It is happening that we are getting the previous response in a rich text field(showing the local variable data) from the API for a particular value on an interface. If we change the value then only we are getting a new response. If we use same value again and again and setting different Timeout limit in the integration, the output we are getting from an API is same until and unless we change the value. Is Appian cached the value-API response on an interface?
Hi, is there a link or a dedicated space where we can submit suggestions for missing icons in the Appian library based on specific customer use cases? I’ve often found that certain icons could enhance a user interface but were not available, such as a drilling rig for the Energy and Utilities industry.Many thanks in advance!
Hi, A user task with notification setting enabled - sends mail when it reaches the node. This user task has a Save button, which brings the control back to the same node in the process flow. Upson save, mail notification triggers again. Tried activity chaining to avoid 2nd time notification upon save, but triggers mail. Is it possible to avoid this? Note: I can have a split gateway and have a mail notification smart service and disable the automatic config. But wanted to check if there is any OOTB. Any help/ideas are appreciated. Thanks,Keerthi
Hi All, while user trying to upload file from the site its taking 30 to 40 sec time to open file folder,. thanks
Dear Appian Community, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to bring attention to an issue that many of us have encountered and to encourage everyone to submit an enhancement request to prioritize its resolution. Issue: Saved User Filters Removed When Adding New User Filters #PreserveUserSavedFilters Many users, including myself, have experienced a significant inconvenience where saved user filters are removed when a new user filter is added to a record type and interface. This issue disrupts user experience, especially for those who have invested time in customizing their filters to optimize their reports. Example Use Case: ----------------------------------------------------------- * Description: In our application, users extensively utilize the feature to save and manage their filter settings on record type-based interfaces. Recently, we encountered an issue where adding a new user filter to the record type resulted in the removal of all previously saved user filter
Hi Team, Validation should be triggered if the user enters two consecutive dots in the text field. How can we handle this?
Hi, I was wondering if we can export the readonly grid to text file (.txt)? any suggestion on the user interface and process model? The current build in function can only export the data to excel. Thanks,
Hi, I am using a grid field and a rule input to save the selected rows, but all the selected row values are not saved in the rule input. Suppose I am selecting four rows only the value of 2 rows is saved in the rule input. When I select all the rows at once this is a problem. But if I select one row after other it doesn't create a problem.Attaching the code snippet for reference: Any help in this regard will be appreciated.
Hello, I have a use case where a read-only grid displays a list of projects, with one column showing statuses such as Complete, Cancelled, Design, etc. I want to enable users to click on the status, which should then display a dropdown containing all available statuses. The user should be able to select a new status, and the update should be saved to the database accordingly. Requirements: Clicking on the status field should open a dropdown with all status options. Once a new status is selected, it should be immediately updated in the database.
Hi Team, I want to create two columns in Interface, one column will have Calander and when we click on the date , it will display on the second column, anyone got the answer, plz share the code
Hi Appian community members, currently we are using a!columnChartField to display some columns in a UI. Recently there are many columns added, is there a way to make the column chart scrollable from left to right so all columns not squeezed? a!columnChartField seems don't have any parameters can control whether scrollable. Any suggestions? Thanks.
Hi! Has anyone implemented an interface with a similar visual style? A grid field with rows and the rows have an icon that when you click expands a section. I could be wrong, but I think Appian doesn't currently have an out-of-the-box component/layout for this, hence I'm trying to find a workaround. I am looking for ideas on how I can at least mimic a fraction of this style in Appian.
Hello everyone, { a!columnsLayout( columns: a!columnLayout( contents: if( ri!showAllLinks_bool, {}, rule!CR_APP_RT_displayApproverInfoNote( message_txt: "New workflow cannot be initiated as another child flow is open/in-progress" ) ) ) ), /*Release & delete to be shown where action proposed = Release or Delete*/ /*No other Child process to be shown when release/delete proposed*/ /*process button shown to DU users only*/ if( contains( cons!CR_APP_CHOICES_ACTION_PROPOSED, tostring( index( ri!crAppSelected_cdt, "proposedAction_txt", null ) ) ), a!columnsLayout( alignVertical: "TOP", columns: { if( and( contains( { cons!CR_TXT_CCAD_UNIT, cons!CR_TXT_SYND_GROUP }, rule!CR_FN_getUserRole(loggedInUser()) ),
I was sending a data in json format like { a!tojson("fruit": "apple") } but the output i was getting { "fruit": ["apple"] }but i need without square brackets . Could anyone please help me on this and thanks for advance
I have a dropdown field that is giving me trouble. It used to work, but just started today. It throws, "An error occurred while executing a save: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid index: Cannot update integer index from type List of Null". I am interpreting this error message to mean that I am trying to save a Null value into an integer index. [View:/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/13/Dropdown-Field-Error.mp4:899:244] I am limiting the drop down to the latest event. I do not want the applicant to choose any other value except the latest on. Here is the code: a!sideBySideItem( item: a!dropdownField( data: null, choiceLabels: rule!PMSO_getEventforLU()[1].event, choiceValues: rule!PMSO_getEventforLU()[1].eventId, label: "I am applying for the following Event", labelPosition: "ABOVE", placeholder: "--- Select an Event to apply ---",
Hello All , There are 10 tabs in a record view and every tab has certain view level security configured to them but now the view level security show be removed and placed inside the interface .Upon click of the page/interface check if its eligible then print the existing interface else show an error message . I wanted to know what will happen if we remove the view level security from record and place it inside interface.
I want the interface to open and the process to run simultaneously and after some seconds I need the interface to close automatically without user interaction (Process model used in related action).
Would be nice if tooltips could have bold text! Pretty basic but useful feature. Makes it easier to scan and read important stuff in the tooltips.
Hi Appian Community, I’m working on an Editable Grid and need some help with the following requirements: I have 4 fields in each row: 3 of them should be read-only, and 1 should be editable (this will be a Radio Button field). The Radio Button field should allow users to select one of several options. The button (located outside the grid) should only be clickable when at least one option is selected in the Radio Button field for each row. Could you please help me with: The configuration for the Editable Grid where three fields are read-only, and the Radio Button field is editable. A way to ensure that the button is only enabled when the Radio Button field is selected for all rows in the grid. Thanks in advance for your assistance!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
