-
Recently active
Hi Team, if I configure the horizontal milestone it looks good like having more length in between values, but have a requirement same style we need to achieve in vertical style ' but here we can increase length of each value like how we have in horizontal , please suggest me better approach, Thanks
Hi Folks, In my interface if i delete anything i want to display a banner says Success!(Image added below) One i click delete as soon as the banner should display and after 5 seconds the banner should hide. how to achieve it. i have gone through with refresh Interval it did not worked as i expected. any plugin or anything
Hi All, Hope everyone is doing well, I have a requirement, where we are using task reports for assigning tasks in application UI. I need to implement the auto refresh the tasks assigned to the logged in users. Can you please help me understand what the logic would be I need to use. Please find the attached code snippet I have used currently. a!gridField_23r3( emptyGridMessage: "No Assigned Tasks", /*label: "Read-only Grid",*/ /*labelPosition: "ABOVE",*/ data: a!queryProcessAnalytics( report: cons!CTRIS_MY_TASK_REPORT, query: a!query( logicalExpression:{ a!queryLogicalExpression( operator: "AND", filters:{ a!queryFilter( field: "c12", operator: "
How to remove the "appian" logo from top-right corner of Site. I didn't find any option in site configuration.
I'm trying to simulate a double-click-like behavior in a read-only grid using a!gridField_24r3. The goal is to return a selected row's value when a user clicks on a field grid value twice. I am able to save the value of the grid after selecting it for the very first time by using fv!deselectedRows. Refer below code:a!save( local!previousSelectedRow, if( length(local!currentSelectedRow) = 0, index(fv!deselectedRows, 1, null), local!previousSelectedRow ) ) Now within the parameter "selectionvalue" of a!gridField_24r3, I am trying to manipulate the value it holds with below logic where I put a condition if there is no selection made --> ri!selected will be empty but we have a value store within local!previousSelectedrow then we should get the id of that grid returned. if( a!isNotNullOrEmpty(ri!selected), ri!selected, if( a
Hi All, My requirement is if any error comesup then it has to redirect to the same interface to modify the form and then resubmit the form again . IN the 2nd interface (which is same as 1st) I'm getting the below error .can someone please help.An error occurred while evaluating expression: Error.message:AC!error.body (Invalid index: Cannot index property 'body' of type Text into type IntegrationError) (Data Outputs)
Hi All,Currently we are having a workflow which consists of a task which will be worked by a user. When any updates to the workflow occur from external system, we cannot show the updates to the user in the UI when user has the UI already open since the data cannot be refreshed. We are thinking of either cancelling and creating a new workflow with the latest updates or completing the task using smart service and recreating the task within the same workflow. Any insights on which will be better approach will be useful.
We have a dropdown value in the editable grid, and when we click on the add row button in the editable grid we have to get unique values for each row which means already selected value should be removed for next row in the grid dropdown. For your reference below is the first row I selected App Number and I clicked add row , now in the second row dropdown we should not get App number similarly for all rows. a!gridLayout( label: "DropDown", labelPosition: "ABOVE", headerCells: { a!gridLayoutHeaderCell( label: rule!INZ_I18N_displayLabel( i18nData: local!i18nInterfaceData, bundleKey: cons!INZ_CONS_TXT_INTERFACE_COMPONENT_INTERNATIONALIZATION & ".fieldLabelEnglish" ) ), a!gridLayoutHeaderCell( label: rule!INZ_I18N_displayLabel(
Hi All, Hope everyone is doing good..!!!, we have a requirement to export the UI data into PDF document file along with text filelds and signature fields, Can anyone please let me know what would be the best approach to achieve this requirement. I have tried using PDF from DOCX smart service to export the data into word document template and then tried to convert the same into PDF. But unfortunately I am able to capture the signatures as document Ids, not as signature images. Can someone please help us how to get the signature properly in PDF file. Regards, Dheeraj G
Hi Team, I am trying to use XOR gate in the process model for diverting the flow based on the 2 conditions as shown below , here in XOR gate we are getting error because 2nd condition getting failed as per our analysis it should go end node because the first condition becomes true in that case why XOR gate checking 2nd condition? could you please suggest me! Thanks!
Hi, I am getting above error while selecting user for task assignment on the interface. a!pickerFieldUsersAndGroups( value: rule!<rulename>( fv!item.Assignee ), Rule code if( rule!APN_isBlank( ri!userOrGroup ), null, if( charat( tostring( ri!userOrGroup ), 1 ) = "[", togroup( ri!userOrGroup ), touser( ri!userOrGroup ) ))
Hi Community, I am using a!recorddata for my readonly grid. record is API backed which has 3.5 million rows of meta data (just 4 columns). I am using pagesize as 50. I have provided filters in UI for users to narrow down their search. Since currently I am only using sample size data , Should I expect any performance issues once 3.5 million data is synced into records? I didn't find any recipes for a!recorddata with pagesize. So also would like to understand how readonly grid interprets and handles pagination just by using pagesize without any limitation on amount of records?
There are two button in my form, one is submit another is cancel. I have many validations in my form, but I notice that, the validations are applied to both buttons. I've also tried the validation group, but the behavior is after I click the button the validation will take effect.What I expect is that the verification will be performed after the user has entered the content, and it will only take effect on the submit button. Is this possible in Appian? If the validation group is the only way I can achieve, Is it possible to disable the submit button after the validation triggered?
Hi everyone, There is a read-only grid that uses a record-type data source. The table structure is as follows: Request Id (Primary Key) Name (varchar) In the grid filters, I’m applying a filter on the Request Id using the IN operator, and passing the values {9, 5, 3}. However, the grid displays the results in sorted order as {3, 5, 9}. I want the grid to display the records in the same sequence as the values I pass in the filter — i.e., {9, 5, 3} — without sorting them. How can I achieve this? Thanks in advance !
There are many components in my interface, and each component has their own validations. I want to implement a require like if any validation is triggered, the submit button should be disable. Is there any easy way I can achieve that? Or I can only write all the validations again in disable.
I'm currently passing emailaddresses in each line but when i submit it is storing values as test@test.com;test2@test.com but it has tostore in db as in new line and it has to be passed to an integration as {"test@test.com,test2@test.com"} Can someone please help
Hi Team, we are trying to implement record field validation through applyvalidation function , its not it working as expected, please refer below screenshot, this is the screenshot of pre-configured validation code in UI we tried to implement validation but it didn't worked as expected , as shown below, please suggest if missed anything configured. Note: I have tried this logic appian community edition thanks in advance
In the grid I am getting the same plan name whatever plan I select in the dropdown , Can anyone help me fix this? a!localVariables( local!wmsPlans: index( rule!WMS_qr_Plan( columns: { 'recordType!{a64248d4-beb2-46af-9f5f-eb0f79b17649}WMS PLAN.fields.{f39ad615-5340-4968-8dd2-3b4d81474095}planName', 'recordType!{a64248d4-beb2-46af-9f5f-eb0f79b17649}WMS PLAN.fields.{a8baeebc-1ffb-4f0a-9096-d148777d3756}planId' }, clientId: 11, planStatus: "Active" ).data, {} ), local!vetRequestPlans: index( rule!VET_qr_RequestPlans_ByFilters(requestId: 1188 ), {} ), local!additionalCITplans, local!plansSelected, local!editablePlans: if( length(a!flatten(local!plansSelected)) > 0, reject( fn!isnull, { a!forEach( items: local!vetRequestPlans, expression: if( contains( local!plansSelected, fv!item['recordType!{9339afa7-3440-42ac-9d18-6e89a7
I noticed a behaviour , just curious to understand more details if anybody knows Using API backed record for read only grid, case1:- For data: a!recorddata() was used and action was configured as below a!recordActionField( actions:a!recordActionItem( action: 'recordType!myRecord.actions.myAction', identifier: fv!identifier case2:- For data: a!queryrecordtype() was used and action was configured as below a!recordActionField( actions:a!recordActionItem( action: 'recordType!myRecord.actions.myAction', identifier: fv!row[recordty
I am not sure it is a basic or i am missing a point . We're working with a multi-interface navigation in Appian (6 interfaces navigated via buttons). When a user clicks a button to go to the next interface, the interface loads correctly, but the page does not scroll to the top. We do not want to use a process model with chaining to reload the form. We also tried using formLayout(focusOnFirstInput: true) but that didn’t help. How can we make the form automatically scroll to the top on each interface load using only SAIL/interface logic? Setup :headercontent layout hosts - header, contents {two interfaces}.interface1 have 2 columns , first column hosts navigation and other one hosts subinterfacesinterface 2 have buttons : Go Back , Save & Continue How it works:On the first page (interface), the user fills out the details and scrolls down to click the "Save & Continue" button. When clicked, the navigation counter increments, and the user is taken to the next pa
Hi Everyone, We have a way to use a Record type designed to have a database view as data source into a Records Chat Component? local!data: a!queryRecordByIdentifier( recordType: 'MY RECORD WITH DATABASE VIEW AS SOURCE HERE', identifier: ri!id ), a!recordsChatField( recordType: 'MY RECORD WITH DATABASE VIEW AS SOURCE HERE', identifier: ri!id, height: "TALL", initialMessage: concat( "For this instance of ", local!data['MY RECORD WITH DATABASE VIEW AS SOURCE HERE.fields.{processName}processName'], " process, I have the following data available: " ), suggestedQuestions: { concat( "When this instance was created?" ), concat( "What is the instance deadline?" ), concat( "What is the process version of ", local!data['MY RECORD WITH DATABASE VIEW AS SOURCE HERE.fields.{processName}processName'], " instance?" ) }, fields: { 'MY RECORD WITH DATABASE VIEW AS SOURCE HERE.fields.{instanceId}instanceId'
Hello everyone.I'm using the web content field in Appian. I want to display a site, but when I add the URL, it says the site is refusing the connection. In the example image, I added the Appian page.I'd like to know what settings I should make on my end, or if the settings are for the server where the site is hosted.
a!isUserMemberOfGroup( username: loggedInUser(), groups: cons!IP_GRP_RECRUITERS ) So this above code i gave it so that that particular field is visible to the specific user from the specific group only, but its not working when i gave it in a read only grid. This code did work in the normal interface and it only showed the particular field to the particular user of specific group only , but when i gave it in the read only interface, its not working. What anyone help me with what might be the issue.
I have a read only grid interface whose source is record data (API backed record). Record holds 3 million data which is one time sync . If I need to implement two custom picker fields for two columns (ex: Year & Name, max selection is 5 ) and grid should reload even with combination filter as well. Please drop your suggestions to implement this without affecting the performance much.
I have requirement in which a user uploads a document while composing a comment. The uploaded document should be stored temporarily, and its ID held until the user submits the comment. If the comment is submitted, the document becomes permanent; otherwise, it should remain temporary.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.